Federal contractor · SALT LAKE CITY, UT

NWT INC.

NWT INC. received $1.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (0% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.4M).

Obligations · FY2026: $1.4M
New awards: 1
Sole-source: 0.0%
Single offer: 100%

UEI: CBU4MKQ8KWP8
Parent company: LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS

Small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS company family: 13 registered entities, $1.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGSBURLINGTON, NC · Family page
Reported parent$23.4K
ACCUPATH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORIES INCSAN DIEGO, CA
Reported parent$0
COLORADO LABORATORY SERVICES, LLCCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO
Reported parent$0
COVANCE INC.PRINCETON, NJ
Reported parent$0
ESOTERIX, INC.AUSTIN, TX
Reported parent$0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

0FY2017
1.4MFY2024
1.4MFY2025
1.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Department of the Army$1.4M100%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Facilities & utilities$1.4M100%

Where the work was performed

Fairfax County, VA$1.4M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition100%
US 39% · $1.4M
Sole-source awards0.0%
US 30% · $0
Single-offer competitions100%
US 8.8% · $1.4M
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

ELECTRIC COSTS CUDE BUILDING - BASE YEAR$4.3M
Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Facilities & utilities· Dec 29, 2023 – Dec 30, 2025· W912HQ24F0026

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $124.9K reported

NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES$124.9K
CONCORD, NH · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

CREATIVE TESTING SOLUTIONS$8.7M−19% in FY2026
TEMPE, AZ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Medical and diagnostic laboratoriesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Medical and diagnostic laboratories
AUSDANBROOK PROPERTIES INC$912.9K−29% in FY2026
HAMPTON, GA · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Medical and diagnostic laboratories
MOBILE IMAGING OF AMERICA CORP$2M−21% in FY2026
DECATUR, GA · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Medical and diagnostic laboratories

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS (13 recipients).

Matched organizations

Laboratory Corporation of AmericaAI match · 100%
Laboratory Corporation of America HoldingsAI match · 100%
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS POLITICAL PARTICIPATION COMMITTEEAI match · 99%

Lobbying · 2025: $1.7M; 16 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $6.6M; $6.6M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026: $258K; 1 PAC

Lobbying by year

2023$2.1M
16 reports
2024$1.6M
16 reports
2025$1.7M
16 reports
2026$1.2M
8 reports

Top issues

Health issues43 reports
Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code11 reports
Medicare and Medicaid10 reports
Medical and disease research, clinical labs4 reports
Budget and appropriations1 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES42 reports
U.S. SENATE42 reports
Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)5 reports
Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS)5 reports
White House Office3 reports
Justice - Dept of (DOJ)2 reports
Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)2 reports
Transportation - Dept of (DOT)2 reports
Centers For Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)1 reports
Executive Office of the President (EOP)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP$1.5M
14 reports
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$840K
14 reports
Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein LLP$168K
14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

Republican$172K67%
Democratic$86K33%

PACs sponsored

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS POLITICAL PARTICIPATION COMMITTEE$227.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2026 cycle

Gus M. Bilirakis$10K
R-FL-12 · House · 1 PAC
Troy Balderson$10K
R-OH-12 · House · 1 PAC
Diana DeGette$10K
D-CO-1 · House · 1 PAC
Brian K. Fitzpatrick$10K
R-PA-1 · House · 1 PAC
Brett Guthrie$10K
R-KY-2 · House · 1 PAC
Richard Hudson$10K
R-NC-9 · House · 1 PAC
Frank Pallone, Jr.$10K
D-NJ-6 · House · 1 PAC
Scott H. Peters$10K
D-CA-50 · House · 1 PAC
H. Morgan Griffith$7,500
R-VA-9 · House · 1 PAC
Mike Thompson$7,500
D-CA-4 · House · 1 PAC

$258K of the $263.5K its PACs gave to federal candidates went to 81 members of Congress.

Members whose campaigns received from its PACs, 2024 cycle

Gus M. Bilirakis$10K
R-FL-12 · House · 1 PAC
Brett Guthrie$10K
R-KY-2 · House · 1 PAC
Richard Hudson$10K
R-NC-9 · House · 1 PAC
Richard E. Neal$10K
D-MA-1 · House · 1 PAC
Frank Pallone, Jr.$10K
D-NJ-6 · House · 1 PAC

Direct and in-kind contributions the members' campaigns received (FEC), net of refunds. Party and seat are the member's current or latest.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 2377 · Saving Access to Laboratory Services Act10 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2023–2024
S. 1000 · Saving Access to Laboratory Services Act10 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2023–2024
H.R. 5269 · RESULTS Act8 reports
119th Congress · Introduced · 2025–2026
S. 2761 · RESULTS Act8 reports
119th Congress · Introduced · 2025–2026
H.R. 8702 · Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 20246 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2024

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.