Federal contractor · WINCHESTER, VA

OAKWOOD ELECTRONICS, L.L.C.

No contract obligations recorded for OAKWOOD ELECTRONICS, L.L.C. in FY2026. Since FY2022: $1.9M. It also received $207K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
RPLUK5KPRG14
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 748.9KFY2022
  2. 927.2KFY2023
  3. 199.6KFY2024
  4. 0FY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for OAKWOOD ELECTRONICS, L.L.C. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

OAKWOOD ELECTRONICS, L.L.C. received $207K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards), −83% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research ($207K).

Assistance · FY2026
$207K
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2021
$5.8M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 762.3KFY2021
  2. 1.5MFY2022
  3. 1.4MFY2023
  4. 657.5KFY2024
  5. 1.3MFY2025
  6. 207KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$207K100%

Top programs

  1. 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research$207K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. NEW CA$5.8M
    12.431 · Basic Scientific Research· Department of the Army· Cooperative agreement· Jul 22, 2021 – May 19, 2026· W911NF2120201

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  2. SANTA CLARA, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  3. RALEIGH, NC · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.