Federal contractor · ANNAPOLIS, MD

OCEANETICS INC

OCEANETICS INC received $8.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 22 awards (−79% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $220M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($8.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$8.9M
New awards
22
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
38%
UEI
HH9BC5LMUQ27
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedHUBZone firm

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $8.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. OCEANETICS INCANNAPOLIS, MD · Family page
    $8.9M
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.8MFY2017
  2. 8.1MFY2018
  3. 8.4MFY2019
  4. 16.8MFY2020
  5. 7.9MFY2021
  6. 12MFY2022
  7. 31.9MFY2023
  8. 74.3MFY2024
  9. 42.9MFY2025
  10. 8.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 22 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$8M90%
  2. Professional services$489.9K5.5%
  3. Equipment maintenance$381.6K4.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition38%
    US 39% · $3.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions38%
    US 8.8% · $3.4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Hillsborough County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Aug 10, 2024 – Apr 30, 2026· N3943024F4189
  2. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 25, 2023 – May 27, 2026· N3943023F4691
  3. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 13, 2023 – Apr 15, 2026· N3943023F4718
  4. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Aug 30, 2023 – Dec 22, 2025· N3943023F4702
  5. Department of the Navy· Kings County, NY· Professional services· Sep 22, 2025 – Feb 3, 2026· N3943025F0188
  6. Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Aug 9, 2023 – May 13, 2026· N3943023F4643
  7. Department of the Navy· Anne Arundel County, MD· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· N0002426F4102
  8. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Professional services· Aug 22, 2024 – Feb 2, 2026· N3943024F4212

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $11.8M (38 subawards)

32 sub-recipients

  1. MAKAI OCEAN ENGINEERING RESEARCH INC$2.3M20%
    WAIMANALO, HI · 2 subawards
  2. ANNAPOLIS, MD · 1 subaward
  3. HYDE PARK, UT · 1 subaward
  4. RIALTO, CA · 2 subawards
  5. AIEA, HI · 1 subaward
  6. NORTHPOINT SERVICES, LLC$718.8K6.1%
    BRYAN, TX · 2 subawards
  7. LONG BEACH, CA · 1 subaward
  8. WESTERN SPRINGS, IL · 1 subaward
  9. DAYTONA BEACH, FL · 2 subawards
  10. ENCOMPASS CONSULTANT GROUP INC$398.1K3.4%
    CAMARILLO, CA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 133% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $38.6K received
  • FY2023: $920.5K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $29.4M paid out · $57.3K received
  • FY2025: $34.4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $11.8M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

77 companies · $76.6M reported

  1. N CHARLESTON, SC · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BROTHERTON PIPELINE INC$10.8M
    GOLD HILL, OR · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC.$9M
    HANOVER, MD · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $95.8K reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. YORK, PA · 1 subaward · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WOODBRIDGE, VA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CRL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$110.1M−11% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. G 2 SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC.$108.9M−42% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.