Federal contractor · PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI

OCENCO INC

OCENCO INC received $510.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−89% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $66.1M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($306.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$510.7K
New awards
6
Sole-source
36%
Single offer
64%
UEI
T99DCLB5NRH7
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 18.4MFY2017
  2. 18.7MFY2018
  3. 3MFY2019
  4. 2.6MFY2020
  5. 952.3KFY2021
  6. 755.6KFY2022
  7. 10.7MFY2023
  8. 5.9MFY2024
  9. 4.6MFY2025
  10. 510.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$510.7K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $510.7K
  • Sole-source awards36%
    US 30% · $183.3K
  • Single-offer competitions64%
    US 8.8% · $327.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Kenosha County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· May 5, 2026 – May 5, 2026· SPE8E526P0994
  2. Department of the Navy· Kenosha County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· N0010426PLB33
  3. Department of the Navy· Kenosha County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 4, 2025 – Dec 4, 2025· N6133126F0011
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Monroe County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 24, 2026 – Aug 24, 2026· 70Z02826PMIAM0084
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Kenosha County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· May 4, 2026 – May 4, 2026· SPE8E626V1307
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Kenosha County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 23, 2026 – Jan 23, 2026· SPE8E626P0539

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $55.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $142.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2,887 received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $91.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $55.5M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 9 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. PANAMA CITY, FL · 1 subaward · Ship and boat building
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 17 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AVIATECH CORPORATION$3.2M+27% in FY2026
    HIGHLAND VILLAGE, TX · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Communications equipment manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. LOGISTICO LLC$4.7M+58% in FY2026
    WEBSTER, MA · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Communications equipment manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Rubber product manufacturing
  3. SECTURION SYSTEMS, INC.$4.6M+59% in FY2026
    CENTERVILLE, UT · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.