Federal contractor · LEESBURG, VA

OCH TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

OCH TECHNOLOGIES, LLC received $14.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−10% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $50.7M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($14.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.1M
New awards
7
Sole-source
25%
Single offer
11%
UEI
MLSTC738W5N5
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 581.4FY2020
  2. 601.8KFY2021
  3. 1.7MFY2022
  4. 5.9MFY2023
  5. 12.6MFY2024
  6. 15.7MFY2025
  7. 14.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$14.1M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition36%
    US 39% · $5.1M
  • Sole-source awards25%
    US 30% · $3.5M
  • Single-offer competitions11%
    US 8.8% · $1.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Aviation Administration· Fauquier County, VA· Professional services· Apr 10, 2023 – Jun 29, 2026· 693KA923F00078
  2. Federal Aviation Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 19, 2021 – Sep 1, 2026· 693KA921F00161
  3. Federal Aviation Administration· Loudoun County, VA· Professional services· Mar 30, 2023 – Jun 29, 2026· 693KA923F00056
  4. Federal Aviation Administration· Atlantic County, NJ· Professional services· Jul 7, 2023 – Jun 29, 2026· 693KA923F00113
  5. Federal Aviation Administration· Loudoun County, VA· Professional services· Aug 23, 2024 – Jun 29, 2026· 693KA924F00199
  6. Federal Aviation Administration· Loudoun County, VA· Professional services· Aug 7, 2025 – Aug 24, 2026· 693KA725C00015
  7. Department of the Navy· Charleston County, SC· Professional services· Sep 25, 2020 – Feb 18, 2026· N6523620F1029

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $24.4M paid out · $148.5K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $151.7K received
  • FY2025: $1.2M paid out · $161.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $25.6M reported

  1. PASADENA, CA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes that pay it

1 company · $462.1K reported

  1. BEAVERCREEK, OH · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CEXEC, INC.$50.2M−2% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesFederal Aviation Administration · Computer systems design and related services
  2. GRA INC$19.2M+79% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 2 entities · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. RESTON, VA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.