Federal contractor · MILWAUKEE, WI

OES-POND JV II LLC

OES-POND JV II LLC received $3.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−47% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $25.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($3.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.4M
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UE6BK582RKP8
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9.1MFY2023
  2. 6.3MFY2024
  3. 6.4MFY2025
  4. 3.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$3.4M100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$3.4M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Brevard County, FL$3.4M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $3.4M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $3.4M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE NEXT-GENERATION OPERATIONAL SPACEPORTS CONTRACT$16.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Brevard County, FL· Professional services· Sep 28, 2023 – Jun 5, 2026· FA252123F0373
  2. PROJECT NUMBER 243207, ENGINEERING STUDY, STUDY LAUNCH FACILITIES 9 AND 10 AT VANDENBERG SFB, CA$1M
    Department of the Air Force· Santa Barbara County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2025 – Feb 9, 2026· FA461025C0020

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MOSAIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP LLC$14.3M−67% in FY2026
    FULTON, MD · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HEBCO, INC.$15.9M−79% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ZEL TECHNOLOGIES LLC$13.3M+2% in FY2026
    HAMPTON, VA · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.