Federal contractor · HILO, HI

OKAHARA & ASSOCIATES, INC

OKAHARA & ASSOCIATES, INC received $472.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−85% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $17.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($472.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$472.3K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
37%
UEI
MGH3ATHNK5J4
Small businessMinority-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $472.3K in FY2026 together.

  1. OKAHARA & ASSOCIATES, INCHILO, HI · Family page
    $472.3K
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.8MFY2017
  2. 443.6KFY2018
  3. 4.2MFY2019
  4. 1.9MFY2020
  5. 310.1KFY2021
  6. 4.1MFY2022
  7. 329.5KFY2023
  8. 805.5KFY2024
  9. 3.1MFY2025
  10. 472.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$299.9K63%
  2. Professional services$172.5K37%

Where the work was performed

  1. United States$299.9K63%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition37%
    US 39% · $172.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions37%
    US 8.7% · $172.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Aug 7, 2023 – Jan 14, 2026· W9128A23F0019
  2. Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2022 – Mar 31, 2026· W9128A22F0035
  3. Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Professional services· Dec 23, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· W9128A26FA007

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. YORK, PA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MOFFATT & NICHOL$4.3M+141% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 8 entities · 99.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SSFM-COFFMAN LLC$4.3M+236% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.