Federal contractor · WEST HILLS, CA

ONE LAMBDA, INC.

ONE LAMBDA, INC. received $3.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (+141% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $22.8M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.1M
New awards
10
Sole-source
97%
Single offer
3.3%
UEI
YXYJG67KTLL7
Parent company
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY L.L.C. company family: 23 registered entities, $124.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY L.L.C.PITTSBURGH, PA · Family page
    $33.2M
  2. THERMO ELECTRON NORTH AMERICA LLCWEST PALM BEACH, FL
    $27.6M
  3. LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONCARLSBAD, CA
    $24.4M
  4. FEI COMPANYHILLSBORO, OR
    $12.7M
  5. FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY L.L.C.PITTSBURGH, PA
    $6.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.6MFY2017
  2. 1.9MFY2018
  3. 2.8MFY2019
  4. 1.5MFY2020
  5. 2.4MFY2021
  6. 1.2MFY2022
  7. 1.9MFY2023
  8. 2MFY2024
  9. 1.3MFY2025
  10. 3.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs$1.5M50%
    4 awards
  2. Defense Health Agency$856.6K27%
    2 awards
  3. National Institutes of Health$716.6K23%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$2.2M71%
  2. Health & medical$844.6K27%
  3. Equipment maintenance$27.9K0.9%
  4. IT & telecom$22.2K0.7%

Where the work was performed

  1. Los Angeles County, CA$2.2M71%
  2. Montgomery County, MD$878.8K28%
  3. Johnson County, IA$18.7K0.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $3.1M
  • Sole-source awards97%
    US 30% · $3M
  • Single-offer competitions3.3%
    US 8.8% · $103.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs$1.5M
    Department of Veterans Affairs · 2 awards
  2. Defense Health Agency$856.6K
    Department of Defense · 2 awards
  3. National Institutes of Health$612.7K
    Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. DELIVERY ORDER - ORDERING PERIOD 1 FOR ONE LAMBDA INC. REAGENTS.$1.3M
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 1, 2025 – May 29, 2026· 36C26326N0198
  2. PROVIDE ORGAN TRANSPLANT SUPPLIES TO THE ORGAN TRANSPLANT DEPARTMENT. POP: 26 JAN 2026 - 30 SEP 2026$847.4K
    Defense Health Agency· Montgomery County, MD· Health & medical· Feb 10, 2026 – May 5, 2026· HT001426FE021
  3. IDIQ FOR ONE LAMBDA HLA REAGENTS$789.2K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 1, 2024 – Oct 20, 2025· 36C26325N0249
  4. VARIOUS HLS TYPING AND ANTIBODY SCREENING REAGENTS$617.2K
    National Institutes of Health· Los Angeles County, CA· Health & medical· Aug 6, 2020 – Apr 30, 2026· 75N90020F00001
  5. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACQUISITION IS TO PROVIDE HLA TYPING AND ANTIBODY SCREENING REAGENTS TO THE HLA LAB ON A REGULAR BASIS.$615.4K
    National Institutes of Health· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· 75N98026P00621
  6. HLA PRO PRIMARY$324.9K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 17, 2026 – Sep 17, 2026· 36C26326P0688
  7. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACQUISITION IS TO PROVIDE HLA TYPING AND ANTIBODY SCREENING REAGENTS TO THE HLA LAB FOR CLINICAL TESTING.$81.7K
    National Institutes of Health· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· 75N98026P00205
  8. HISTO TRAC SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE$62.3K
    National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Dec 6, 2023 – Dec 9, 2025· 75N90024P00090

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $867.6K reported

  1. AGISOL LLC$656.1K
    MARRIOTTSVILLE, MD · 1 subaward · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing
  2. LANEVIS, L.L.C$211.6K
    SILVER SPRING, MD · 2 subawards · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing

Primes that pay it

60 companies · $154.3M reported

  1. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$65M
    LITTLE ROCK, AR · 1 subaward
  2. CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC$14.7M
    FREDERICK, MD · 41 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. LEIDOS, INC.$12.4M
    RESTON, VA · 47 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 251 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GOVERNMENT SCIENTIFIC SOURCE INC$329.5M−26% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalersNational Institutes of Health · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingAgricultural Research Service · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+13 more
  2. JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS INC.$177M−29% in FY2026
    RARITAN, NJ · 18 entities · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalersVeterans Affairs · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceVeterans Affairs · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing+1 more
  3. VETERANS HEALTHCARE SUPPLY SOLUTIONS, INC$202.1M+12% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Professional and commercial equipment and supplies merchant wholesalersVeterans Affairs · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingVeterans Affairs · Medical equipment and supplies manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY L.L.C. (23 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.AI match · 100%
  • THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. PACAI match · 94%
Lobbying · 2025
$2.8M
24 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$7.8M
$7.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$189.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$2.1M
    20 reports
  2. 2024$2M
    21 reports
  3. 2025$2.8M
    24 reports
  4. 2026$990K
    10 reports

Top issues

  1. Health issues46 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations42 reports
  3. Law enforcement, crime and criminal justice28 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code20 reports
  5. Homeland security16 reports
  6. Science and technology11 reports
  7. Environment and Superfund10 reports
  8. Trade (domestic and foreign)10 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES63 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE62 reports
  3. Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS)28 reports
  4. Natl Institutes of Health (NIH)12 reports
  5. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)11 reports
  6. Food & Drug Administration (FDA)11 reports
  7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)10 reports
  8. White House Office10 reports
  9. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)7 reports
  10. Natl Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST)5 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Monument Advocacy$930K
    14 reports
  2. Ernst & Young LLP (Washington Council Ernst & Young)$480K
    14 reports
  3. Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs$435K
    14 reports
  4. BLUEBIRD STRATEGIES$380K
    14 reports
  5. Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips$60K
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$98K52%
  2. Republican$91.5K48%

PACs sponsored

  • THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. PAC$120.9K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.