Federal contractor · HONOLULU, HI

ONEBRIEF, INC.

ONEBRIEF, INC. received $9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−32% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $30.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($6.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9M
New awards
7
Sole-source
67%
Single offer
33%
UEI
CKJ1WPXZB4Y3
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 50KFY2019
  2. 22KFY2020
  3. 1.3MFY2022
  4. 1.5MFY2023
  5. 6MFY2024
  6. 13.2MFY2025
  7. 9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$8.9M100.0%
  2. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100.0%
    US 39% · $8.9M
  • Sole-source awards67%
    US 30% · $6M
  • Single-offer competitions33%
    US 8.8% · $2.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Hillsborough County, FL· IT & telecom· Jul 31, 2025 – Jun 1, 2026· FA481425P0040
  2. Department of the Air Force· Hampton city, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 22, 2025 – Dec 22, 2025· FA440726P0006
  3. Department of the Air Force· St. Clair County, IL· IT & telecom· Nov 26, 2025 – Nov 26, 2025· FA440726F0015
  4. Department of the Army· Bell County, TX· IT & telecom· Mar 13, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· W56ZLW26P0006
  5. Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Research & development· Aug 23, 2023 – Feb 19, 2026· N6833523C0585
  6. Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· IT & telecom· Sep 23, 2025 – May 21, 2026· W91QF425PA042
  7. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Jan 16, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FF984

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.4M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $10.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $15.6M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PASCAGOULA, MS · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VIA SCIENCE INC$26.1M−66% in FY2026
    SOMERVILLE, MA · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Software publishersNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. HTX LABS, INC$39.8M−88% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Software publishers
  3. IMMERSIVE WISDOM, INC.$13.9M−100% in FY2026
    BOCA RATON, FL · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • ONEBRIEF, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$780K
20 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.4M
$1.3M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$34K
    5 reports
  3. 2025$780K
    20 reports
  4. 2026$550K
    13 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense36 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations11 reports
  3. Science and technology5 reports
  4. Government issues1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES34 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE33 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. CGCN GROUP, LLC$500K
    5 reports
  2. MORAN GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC.$220K
    6 reports
  3. ZERO MILE STRATEGIES$220K
    6 reports
  4. Etherton and Associates, Inc.$160K
    4 reports
  5. TSG ADVOCATES DC, LLC$56K
    1 reports
  6. Echelon Government Affairs$50K
    6 reports
  7. Monument Strategy & Solutions$24K
    3 reports
  8. COGNITAE$0
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.