Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

OPTUM PHARMACY 801, INC.

OPTUM PHARMACY 801, INC. received $848.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 28 awards (−64% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $35.2M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($848.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$848.2K
New awards
28
Sole-source
63%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
K5MHR9JB9ND5
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the OPTUMSERVE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. company family: 30 registered entities, $2.5B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. OPTUMSERVE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.LA CROSSE, WI · Family page
    $1.9B
  2. $508.7M
  3. $79.8M
  4. $38M
  5. $28.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-09

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 907KFY2018
  2. 4.4MFY2019
  3. 6.3MFY2020
  4. 5.9MFY2021
  5. 13.6MFY2022
  6. 467.3KFY2023
  7. 321.5KFY2024
  8. 2.3MFY2025
  9. 848.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 28 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Health & medical$915.6K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition44%
    US 39% · $369.6K
  • Sole-source awards63%
    US 30% · $531.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$162K
  • Urgency justifications18%
    US 5.1% · $156K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 5 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Dallas County, TX· Health & medical· May 8, 2025 – Jan 22, 2026· 36C25725N0318
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Potter County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 17, 2021 – Dec 22, 2025· 36C25721N0543
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Washoe County, NV· Health & medical· Oct 1, 2024 – Nov 3, 2025· 36C26125N0076
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Health & medical· Jun 26, 2025 – Nov 17, 2025· 36C26025N0392
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Washoe County, NV· Health & medical· Oct 1, 2025 – Mar 26, 2026· 36C26126N0060
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Health & medical· Apr 1, 2025 – Nov 10, 2025· 36C24225N0463
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Health & medical· Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· 36C26126N0050
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· Maricopa County, AZ· Health & medical· Aug 4, 2025 – Sep 29, 2026· 36C24525P0686

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

17 companies · $11.4M reported

  1. CARE CONNECT CONSULTING, LLC$3.5M
    HYATTSVILLE, MD · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. LITTLETON, CO · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Primes that pay it

13 companies · $23.5M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 11 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. CAMBRIDGE, MA · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 54 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Offices of physicians
  2. ORLANDO, FL · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Offices of physicians
  3. LEIDOS, INC.$31.5B−13% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 96 entities · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Offices of physiciansArmy · Offices of physicians

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of OPTUMSERVE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. (30 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Change HealthcareAI match · 99%
  • United HealthCare Services, Inc.AI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$600K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.2M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    1 reports
  2. 2024$250K
    2 reports
  3. 2025$600K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$300K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Health issues8 reports
  2. Veterans8 reports

Who was contacted

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BALLARD PARTNERS$1.2M
    8 reports
  2. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough$40K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.