Federal contractor · NAHA

OTNET COMPANY, INCORPORATED

OTNET COMPANY, INCORPORATED received $25.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−32% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $276.9K. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($25.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$25.1K
New awards
10
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
TME5AJACJJL5
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 33KFY2017
  2. 27.1KFY2018
  3. 38.5KFY2019
  4. 33.7KFY2020
  5. 31.8KFY2021
  6. 26.5KFY2022
  7. 12.4KFY2023
  8. 12KFY2024
  9. 36.7KFY2025
  10. 25.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 10 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$25.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$25.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $25.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $25.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· FA520926F9116
  2. Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· FA520926F9017
  3. Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Nov 1, 2025 – Nov 1, 2025· FA520926F9018
  4. Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Dec 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025· FA520926F9019
  5. Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Jan 1, 2026 – Jan 1, 2026· FA520926F9020
  6. Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· FA520926F9118
  7. Department of the Air Force· Professional services· May 1, 2026 – May 1, 2026· FA520926F9117
  8. Department of the Air Force· Professional services· Mar 1, 2026 – Mar 1, 2026· FA520926F9085

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. QTNET, INC.$53.7K−29% in FY2026
    FUKUOKA, JPN · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers
  2. CEQUEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC$99.4K+163% in FY2026
    LONG ISLAND CITY, NY · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers
  3. OOREDOO Q.P.S.C$158.4K−100% in FY2026
    DOHA, QAT · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Wired and wireless telecommunications carriers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.