Federal contractor · NEW YORK, NY

OVID TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

OVID TECHNOLOGIES, INC. received $97.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $31.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($45.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$97.8K
New awards
4
Sole-source
47%
Single offer
25%
UEI
L5PTRJ63FJB5
Parent company
WOLTERS KLUWER N.V.
Other than small businessForeign-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

10 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $5.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. OVID TECHNOLOGIES, INC.NEW YORK, NY · Family page
    $97.8K
  2. CCH INCORPORATEDRIVERWOODS, IL
    $2.8M
  3. WOLTERS KLUWER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.MINNEAPOLIS, MN
    $2.1M
  4. WOLTERS KLUWER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.SAINT CLOUD, MN
    $130.8K
  5. WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.PHILADELPHIA, PA
    $124.5K
  6. CRONER GROUP LIMITEDHINCKLEY, GBR
    $20.6K
  7. ASPEN PUBLISHERS, INC.NEW YORK, NY
    $0
  8. C C H INCWASHINGTON, DC
    $0
  9. CCH INCORPORATEDCHICAGO, IL
    $0
  10. WOLTERS KLUWER ITALIA SRLASSAGO, ITA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 608.9KFY2017
  2. 526.8KFY2018
  3. 563.4KFY2019
  4. 456.1KFY2020
  5. 6.1MFY2021
  6. 5.9MFY2022
  7. 6.1MFY2023
  8. 6.3MFY2024
  9. 5MFY2025
  10. 97.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$45.8K47%
    1 awards
  2. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences$27.2K28%
    1 awards
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs$24.8K25%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$73K75%
  2. Professional services$24.8K25%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bexar County, TX$45.8K47%
  2. Montgomery County, MD$27.2K28%
  3. New York County, NY$24.8K25%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition72%
    US 39% · $70.6K
  • Sole-source awards47%
    US 30% · $45.8K
  • Single-offer competitions25%
    US 8.8% · $24.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ONLINE SERVICES FOR JOURNALS$114.8K
    Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Oct 19, 2023 – Dec 17, 2025· W9124J24C0005
  2. THE UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY (USU) LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER (LRC) HAS A REQUIREMENT FOR THE CLERKSHIP COLLECTION OF E-TEXTBOOKS AND OTHER E-BOOKS AND STUDY GUIDES.$27.2K
    Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· HU000126FE022
  3. TELEPHONE TRIAGE EBOOK$24.8K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· New York County, NY· Professional services· Sep 1, 2026 – Sep 1, 2026· 36C24C26P0008
  4. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION MENTAL HEALTH DATABASE SUBSCRIPTION.$0
    Department of Veterans Affairs· New York County, NY· Professional services· May 27, 2026 – Jun 15, 2026· 36C77626C0049

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1M reported

  1. EMPOWER AI, INC.$474.7K
    RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. SAFEGUARD SERVICES LLC$453.5K
    PLANO, TX · 6 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. THE RAND CORPORATION$91.2K
    SANTA MONICA, CA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 81 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FACTIVA INC$8.3M−44% in FY2026
    MONMOUTH JUNCTION, NJ · 11% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSecurities and Exchange Commission · Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information servicesOffice of the Comptroller of the Currency · Other information servicesSocial Security Administration · Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information services
  2. THE IVES GROUP, INC$3.2M+113% in FY2026
    SUTTON, MA · 9.1% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSecurities and Exchange Commission · Web search portals, libraries, archives, and other information services
  3. EBSCO INDUSTRIES INC$31.4M−84% in FY2026
    SHREWSBURY, NJ · 5 entities · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Other information services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of OVID TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (10 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Wolters Kluwer HealthAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2024
$30K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2025
$80K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$20K
    2 reports
  2. 2024$30K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$30K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Health issues8 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES8 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE7 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP$80K
    9 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.