Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

PACIFIC AEROSPACE CONSULTING INC

PACIFIC AEROSPACE CONSULTING INC received $15.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−93% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $951.3K. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($9,886).

Obligations · FY2026
$15.9K
New awards
3
Sole-source
38%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
K1WSENNWSQA3
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 500FY2021
  2. 232.5KFY2023
  3. 460.1KFY2024
  4. 242.2KFY2025
  5. 15.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$9,88662%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$6,04338%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$9,88662%
  2. Professional services$6,04338%

Where the work was performed

  1. Jackson County, OK$9,88662%
  2. Philadelphia County, PA$6,04338%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition38%
    US 39% · $6,043
  • Sole-source awards38%
    US 30% · $6,043
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. FMS LOGISTICS SPECIALIST$652.2K
    Department of the Navy· Philadelphia County, PA· Professional services· Sep 6, 2023 – Dec 5, 2025· N0018923CZ098
  2. FMS LOGISTICS SUPPORT SPECIALIST$235.2K
    Department of the Navy· Philadelphia County, PA· Professional services· Sep 5, 2025 – Mar 10, 2026· N0018925PZ521
  3. SIMCERT EXAMINER COURSE, ALTUS AFB, 12 APR - 18 APR 26$9,886
    Department of the Air Force· Jackson County, OK· Education & social services· Apr 9, 2026 – Apr 9, 2026· FA445226F0026

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $8.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $102.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $8.3M reported

  1. KBR SERVICES, LLC$8.2M
    HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$170.4K
    MCLEAN, VA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SIERRA JV$687.8K−100% in FY2026
    YUMA, AZ · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. ALUTIIQ MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC$692.6K−70% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. BIORESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC$660.7K+25% in FY2026
    OJAI, CA · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.