Federal contractor · COUPEVILLE, WA

PACIFIC RIM INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP

PACIFIC RIM INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP received -$44.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−200% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $253.5K. Its largest customer was U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (-$44.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$44.1K
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
VGETBBDNF2T6
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 106KFY2021
  2. 51.4KFY2022
  3. 52.9KFY2023
  4. 43KFY2024
  5. 44.3KFY2025
  6. -44.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Island County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 8, 2021 – Jul 29, 2026· 140F0521P0213

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PACIFIC RIM INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
1
Since FY2021
$58.2K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 0FY2021
  2. 39.9KFY2022
  3. 18.3KFY2023
  4. 0FY2025
  5. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. 15.946 · Cultural Resources Management· National Park Service· Cooperative agreement· Aug 23, 2022 – Jun 15, 2026· P22AC01909

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHESTERFIELD, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. NEW YORK, NY · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. BONITA SPRINGS, FL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.