Federal contractor · TEMECULA, CA

PACWEST-KORTE JV

PACWEST-KORTE JV received -$180K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $186.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7,891).

Obligations · FY2026
-$180K
New awards
3
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
UUZDVET6D9N5
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1KFY2021
  2. 135.8MFY2022
  3. 762.5KFY2023
  4. 3.4MFY2024
  5. 46.5MFY2025
  6. -180KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Island County, WA· Construction & real property· May 3, 2022 – Nov 3, 2025· N4425522C1500
  2. Department of the Army· Pierce County, WA· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2025 – Jun 5, 2026· W912DW25C0028
  3. Department of the Army· Cumberland County, PA· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2025 – Feb 19, 2026· W912QR25CA033

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.9M (7 subawards)

7 sub-recipients

  1. OLYMPIA, WA · 1 subaward
  2. TACOMA, WA · 1 subaward
  3. KEYSTONE MASONRY, INC$332.5K8.5%
    YELM, WA · 1 subaward
  4. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward
  5. EMERALD FIRE LLC$227.1K5.8%
    GIG HARBOR, WA · 1 subaward
  6. DICKSON COMPANY$70.6K1.8%
    TACOMA, WA · 1 subaward
  7. FOUNDATION RESTORATION LLC$64.5K1.6%
    BELLINGHAM, WA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $14M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $67.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $5.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $64.2K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $3.9M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

70 companies · $90.4M reported

  1. BELLINGHAM, WA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. OAK HARBOR, WA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  3. POWERCO DRYWALL SYSTEMS$8.7M
    ARLINGTON, WA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WARNER ROBINS, GA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. MIDMAC CONTRACTING COMPANY W.L.L$45.8M−100% in FY2026
    DOHA, QAT · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. PUSAN, KOR · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.