Federal contractor · SANTA CLARA, CA

PARADIGM ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, PLLC

PARADIGM ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, PLLC received $41.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards. Since FY2022: $358.4K. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($41.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$41.3K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Q813QKRB2KD3
Parent company
PARADIGM ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, PLLC
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the PARADIGM ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, PLLC company family: 8 registered entities, $611.7K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. PARADIGM ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, PLLCLOUISVILLE, KY · Family page
    $570.4K
  2. PARADIGM ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS PLLCPORTLAND, ME
    $0
  3. PARADIGM ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, PLLCOCALA, FL
    $0
  4. PARADIGM ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, PLLCCHICAGO, IL
    $0
  5. PARADIGM ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, PLLCCARLSBAD, CA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 12.1KFY2022
  2. 341.1KFY2023
  3. -36.1KFY2025
  4. 41.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs$41.3K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$41.3K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Muskogee County, OK$41.3K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. EO14042 AND AE IDIQ$155.2K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Muskogee County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2023 – Jul 23, 2026· 36C25923N0437

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHARLOTTE ENGINEERS, LLP$3.3M−183% in FY2026
    CHARLOTTE, NC · 99.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ENAPAY, LLC$3.4M
    MESQUITE, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STONE HFG ARCHITECTURE, LLC$3.5M
    SIOUX FALLS, SD · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.