Federal contractor · BEAVERCREEK, OH

PARALLAX ADVANCED RESEARCH CORP

PARALLAX ADVANCED RESEARCH CORP received $2.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−79% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $110.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($2.9M). It also received $19.6M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$2.9M
New awards
6
Sole-source
57%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EHEEAGYKUB87
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 11.4MFY2017
  2. 9.4MFY2018
  3. 9.4MFY2019
  4. 10.8MFY2020
  5. 11.5MFY2021
  6. 10.7MFY2022
  7. 16.3MFY2023
  8. 14.7MFY2024
  9. 13.5MFY2025
  10. 2.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.6M57%
  2. Research & development$1.2M43%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition57%
    US 39% · $1.6M
  • Sole-source awards57%
    US 30% · $1.6M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Research & development· May 6, 2022 – Jan 12, 2026· FA865022F6402
  2. Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, OH· Research & development· Nov 21, 2024 – Nov 25, 2025· FA238425FB001
  3. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Research & development· May 6, 2022 – Mar 24, 2026· FA865022F6403
  4. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Research & development· Sep 30, 2024 – Jun 10, 2026· FA238424FB006
  5. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Facilities & utilities· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· FA205726CB003
  6. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 4, 2025 – Dec 4, 2025· HQ085926FE163

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PARALLAX ADVANCED RESEARCH CORP received $19.6M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 18 actions (1 new awards), +42% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 12.615 · Research and Technical Assistance ($19.3M).

Assistance · FY2026
$19.6M
New awards
1
Actions
18
Since FY2021
$69.9M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 12.3MFY2021
  2. 10.1MFY2022
  3. 9.4MFY2023
  4. 4.8MFY2024
  5. 13.8MFY2025
  6. 19.6MFY2026

By type

  1. Other assistance$19.6M100%

Top programs

  1. 12.615 · Research and Technical Assistance$19.3M98%
  2. 12.910 · Research and Technology Development$300K1.5%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Defense
  2. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 12.615 · Research and Technical Assistance· Department of the Air Force· Other financial assistance· Nov 16, 2020 – Sep 24, 2026· FA86501939342
  2. 12.910 · Research and Technology Development· Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Other financial assistance· Nov 14, 2025 – May 27, 2026· HR0011263E021

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $50K (1 subaward)
  • Sub-grants: $267.5K (2 subawards)

3 primes

  1. BLAIRSVILLE, PA · 1 subaward
  2. BLOOMINGTON, IN · 1 subaward
  3. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $3.6M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $8.2M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $5.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $5.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $10.7M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $317.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

16 companies · $33.2M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. BLAIRSVILLE, PA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. BLOOMINGTON, IN · 2 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BRTRC FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, INC.$27.7M−50% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. IDAHO SCIENTIFIC LLC$32.4M−66% in FY2026
    BOISE, ID · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. GENEVA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$33.1M+65% in FY2026
    MONUMENT, CO · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Parallax Advanced ResearchAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$420K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.3M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$305K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$320K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$420K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$220K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense21 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations10 reports
  3. Aerospace2 reports
  4. Agriculture1 reports
  5. Education1 reports
  6. Science and technology1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES9 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE9 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Roosevelt Group$845K
    14 reports
  2. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$240K
    6 reports
  3. McCaulley&Company$180K
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.