Federal contractor · NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO

PAS TECHNOLOGIES INC

PAS TECHNOLOGIES INC received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+5.8% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $29.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.1M
New awards
9
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FG94WVL9BLS7
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the PAS TECHNOLOGIES INC company family: 2 registered entities, $1.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. PAS TECHNOLOGIES INCHILLSBORO, OH · Family page
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 12.9MFY2017
  2. 2.6MFY2018
  3. 3.2MFY2019
  4. 3.7MFY2020
  5. 642.4KFY2021
  6. 1MFY2022
  7. 945.3KFY2023
  8. 2MFY2024
  9. 1.1MFY2025
  10. 1.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$582.5K52%
  2. Equipment maintenance$532.7K48%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.1M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1.1M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 7 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Clay County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 19, 2026 – May 19, 2026· FA812126F0120
  2. Department of the Air Force· Clay County, MO· Equipment maintenance· Dec 8, 2025 – Dec 16, 2025· FA813226F0012
  3. Department of the Air Force· Clay County, MO· Equipment maintenance· Oct 24, 2025 – Oct 24, 2025· FA813226F0001
  4. Department of the Air Force· Clay County, MO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 7, 2026 – Jan 7, 2026· FA812126F0037
  5. Defense Contract Management Agency· Clay County, MO· Equipment maintenance· Aug 4, 2025 – Mar 9, 2026· FA812125F0133
  6. Department of the Air Force· Clay County, MO· Equipment maintenance· Dec 22, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· FA812126F0039
  7. Department of the Air Force· Clay County, MO· Equipment maintenance· Jan 16, 2026 – Jan 16, 2026· FA813226F0023
  8. Department of the Air Force· Clay County, MO· Equipment maintenance· Mar 13, 2026 – Mar 13, 2026· FA813226F0041

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PAS TECHNOLOGIES INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2022
$1M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.1MFY2022
  2. -64.9KFY2023

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2022–FY2023.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $6.1M reported

  1. LYNN, MA · 4 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 7 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AIRCRAFT SERVICES ALLIANCE, LLC$4.1M−100% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. GARDEN GROVE, CA · 3 entities · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. OLMSTED INSTRUMENT CO$4M−28% in FY2026
    MIDDLETOWN, PA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.