Federal contractor · WICHITA, KS
PBP MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
PBP MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. received $1.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (+74% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $25.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($784.2K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.6M
- New awards
- 8
- Sole-source
- 48%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- L21KFGQD7WM8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 995.8KFY2017
- 3.3MFY2018
- 3.9MFY2019
- 3.8MFY2020
- 2.6MFY2021
- 2.7MFY2022
- 2.5MFY2023
- 3MFY2024
- 910.2KFY2025
- 1.6MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$784.2K49%4 awards
- Department of the Navy$526.1K33%2 awards
- Department of the Army$275.4K17%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$1.1M71%
- Professional services$453.6K29%
Where the work was performed
- Sedgwick County, KS$879.5K55%
- Martin County, IN$273.5K17%
- Tarrant County, TX$252.6K16%
- Spokane County, WA$180K11%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition48%US 39% · $765.9K
- Sole-source awards48%US 30% · $765.9K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of the Navy$526.1KDepartment of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Martin County, IN· Professional services· Sep 24, 2021 – Jan 13, 2026· N0018921P0503
- Department of the Army· Sedgwick County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Jan 31, 2023 – Feb 5, 2026· W911SA23P3025
- Department of the Air Force· Sedgwick County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Nov 12, 2025 – Feb 4, 2026· FA462126F0001
- Department of the Air Force· Sedgwick County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Nov 25, 2024 – Feb 4, 2026· FA462125F0003
- Department of the Air Force· Spokane County, WA· Professional services· Aug 29, 2024 – Oct 1, 2025· FA462024C0010
- OPTION PERIOD 3 FUNDING$252.6KDepartment of the Navy· Tarrant County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Dec 11, 2025 – Feb 24, 2026· N6945026F0066
- Department of the Air Force· Sedgwick County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Jan 16, 2025 – Mar 24, 2026· FA462125F0008
- FY26 - KP CONTRACT$5,418Department of the Army· Sedgwick County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· W50S7X26PA004
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- TORRE REFUSE & RECYCLING LLC$1.7M+24% in FY2026ADDY, WA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Waste collection
- BROOKS ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS LLC$2.9M−62% in FY2026PANAMA CITY BEACH, FL · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Waste collectionArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
- MID-EAST SERVICES INC$1.9M−0.7% in FY2026DUNN, NC · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Waste collection
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.