Federal contractor · COLORADO SPRINGS, CO

PEAK RESOURCE CONSERVATION INC

PEAK RESOURCE CONSERVATION INC received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+360% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $5.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JJ7NMTMQS4K9
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.4KFY2018
  2. 517.4KFY2021
  3. 2MFY2022
  4. 757.5KFY2023
  5. 897.2KFY2024
  6. 267KFY2025
  7. 1.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$1.2M100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bexar County, TX$669.8K55%
  2. El Paso County, CO$557.3K45%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.2M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$1.2M
    Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. FACILITY MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES FOR DESERT DEFENDER GROUND COMBAT REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER AT FT. BLISS, TX AND AIR FORCE SECURITY FORCES CENTER AT JBSA LACKLAND, TX IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS).$669.8K
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Mar 31, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026· FA890326P0001
  2. PETERSON SFB AND CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN REFUSE$557.3K
    Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Feb 12, 2026 – May 7, 2026· FA251726PB007

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GLOBAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC$1.5M+4,466% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services
  2. KIRA AEROSPACE LLC$2.3M−102% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services
  3. THE ADELLSEN GROUP LLC$1.9M+1.6% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.