Federal contractor · CHANTILLY, VA

PERATON TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC.

PERATON TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC. received $150.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 84 awards (−30% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2B. Its largest customer was Office of Procurement Operations ($48.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$150.6M
New awards
84
Sole-source
24%
Single offer
29%
UEI
CJ38H41QMGA1
Parent company
VERITAS CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC company family: 60 registered entities, $4.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLCCHANTILLY, VA · Family page
    $699.5M
  2. PERATON INC.HERNDON, VA
    $2.1B
  3. GUIDEHOUSE INC.MC LEAN, VA
    $704.6M
  4. GUIDEHOUSE LLPMCLEAN, VA
    $155.8M
  5. GUIDEHOUSE DIGITAL LLCMCLEAN, VA
    $118.7M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 36MFY2017
  2. 80.4MFY2018
  3. 134.2MFY2019
  4. 151.8MFY2020
  5. 228.5MFY2021
  6. 307.9MFY2022
  7. 412.8MFY2023
  8. 259.5MFY2024
  9. 215.1MFY2025
  10. 150.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Office of Procurement Operations$48.1M32%
    27 awards
  2. Federal Acquisition Service$40.3M27%
    5 awards
  3. Department of the Navy$29M19%
    8 awards
  4. Department of the Army$10.8M7.1%
    4 awards
  5. U.S. Customs and Border Protection$8.7M5.7%
    3 awards
  6. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency$6.8M4.5%
    9 awards
  7. Federal Law Enforcement Training Center$2.5M1.6%
    6 awards
  8. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services$2.2M1.5%
    1 awards
  9. Office of Administrative Services$2M1.3%
    1 awards
  10. Department of the Air Force$1.5M1.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$77.6M51%
  2. Professional services$44.9M29%
  3. Research & development$30.4M20%
  4. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$514.7K0.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Fairfax County, VA$78.6M52%
  2. Anne Arundel County, MD$28.1M19%
  3. St. Mary's County, MD$23.3M16%
  4. Loudoun County, VA$8.3M5.5%
  5. El Paso County, CO$5.5M3.6%
  6. District of Columbia, DC$4.3M2.9%
  7. Hancock County, MS$2.6M1.7%
  8. Glynn County, GA$1.4M0.9%
  9. Harford County, MD$880K0.6%
  10. Kauai County, HI$852K0.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition53%
    US 39% · $79.6M
  • Sole-source awards24%
    US 30% · $36.5M
  • Single-offer competitions29%
    US 8.8% · $43.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$29.7M
    Department of Defense · 5 awards

Largest awards

  1. TASK ORDER AWARD FOR ARCYBER CYBERSPACE OPS REQUIREMENT$486.8M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Anne Arundel County, MD· Professional services· Dec 14, 2018 – Apr 16, 2026· 47QFCA19F0033
  2. CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES COSS$93.4M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Anne Arundel County, MD· Professional services· Jul 28, 2023 – Aug 14, 2026· 47QFMA23F0019
  3. SPACE WEATHER AND FORECAST SYSTEM$80.7M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· Feb 19, 2021 – Sep 21, 2026· 47QFCA21C0006
  4. THE PURPOSE OF THIS GSA OASIS UNRESTRICTED POOL #1 TASK ORDER IS TO PROVIDE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING&TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (SETA) SUPPORT SERVICES TO PROGRAM DIRECTOR (PD) ARMY TACTICAL EXPLOITATION OF NATIONAL CAPABILITIES (ARMY-TENCAP) FOR ONE (1) BASE PERIOD, AND FOUR (4) OPTIONAL PERIODS IF EXERCISED.$41.3M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Feb 27, 2018 – Oct 20, 2025· W56KGY18F0001
  5. RS3 TASK ORDER TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT TO THE ELECTRONIC WARFARE AIR/GROUND SURVIVABILITY (EWAGS) DIVISION.$40.9M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Dec 29, 2021 – Jun 11, 2026· W56KGU22F0002
  6. DMSP DC3GS ENGINEERING SUSTAINMENT SERVICES$30M
    Federal Acquisition Service· El Paso County, CO· Professional services· Sep 1, 2022 – Jul 16, 2026· 47QFPA22F0066
  7. RS3 TASK ORDER TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (SETA) SUPPORT SERVICES REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO SUPPORT THE ELECTRONIC WARFARE AIR/GROUND SURVIVABILITY (EWAGS) DIVISION.$29.6M
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Feb 9, 2022 – Apr 29, 2026· W56KGU22F0005
  8. PRESIDENTIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT EXCHANGE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT CONTRACT (PITSC)$28.6M
    Defense Information Systems Agency· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· May 26, 2021 – May 28, 2026· HC104721F0026

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $179.8M (63 subawards)

40 sub-recipients

  1. CFONE INC$33.4M19%
    GAITHERSBURG, MD · 1 subaward
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$28.1M16%
    CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward
  3. THALES DIS USA INC.$17.5M9.7%
    AUSTIN, TX · 1 subaward
  4. RAVENTEK SOLUTION PARTNERS, LLC$12.9M7.2%
    ASHBURN, VA · 1 subaward
  5. SIMPLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.$11.7M6.5%
    WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward
  6. EXPARA SYSTEMS, INC$11.6M6.5%
    VIENNA, VA · 2 subawards
  7. PRESIDIO GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS LLC$6.8M3.8%
    RESTON, VA · 3 subawards
  8. SOFTCHOICE CORP$6.5M3.6%
    CHICAGO, IL · 1 subaward
  9. GLOBAL TECH INC.$6.2M3.5%
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  10. ONEZERO SOLUTIONS, LLC$5.5M3.1%
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 119% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $54.6M paid out · $6.1M received
  • FY2022: $76.4M paid out · $7.1M received
  • FY2023: $53.6M paid out · $3.6M received
  • FY2024: $70.1M paid out · $5.2M received
  • FY2025: $94.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $179.8M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2,076 companies · $11.6B reported

  1. WESTWIND COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC.$904.1M
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 125 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. KAMBRIAN CORPORATION$843M
    LA PUENTE, CA · 83 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$609.4M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 43 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

123 companies · $3.2B reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$1.3B
    MELBOURNE, FL · 216 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$347M
    RESTON, VA · 82 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$244M
    PASADENA, CA · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 224 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP$11.2B−5.5% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 8 entities · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+15 more
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$13.2B−26% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 67 entities · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+6 more
  3. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$13.3B−22% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 31 entities · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesState · Computer systems design and related services+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC (60 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Chromalloy Gas Turbine, LLCAI match · 100%
  • CHROMALLOY CORPORATION/CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE LLCAI match · 99%
  • PERATON CORP.AI match · 99%
  • THE GUIDEHOUSE INC.AI match · 98%
  • APTIM CORP.AI match · 92%
Lobbying · 2025
$800K
28 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.3M
$2.3M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$412.5K
4 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$630K
    14 reports
  2. 2024$380K
    18 reports
  3. 2025$800K
    28 reports
  4. 2026$470K
    14 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense47 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations30 reports
  3. Intelligence and surveillance25 reports
  4. Transportation23 reports
  5. Homeland security20 reports
  6. Aviation, aircraft and airlines16 reports
  7. Government issues16 reports
  8. Computer industry14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES73 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE72 reports
  3. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)14 reports
  4. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)12 reports
  5. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)9 reports
  6. Treasury - Dept of8 reports
  7. White House Office8 reports
  8. General Services Administration (GSA)6 reports
  9. Interior - Dept of (DOI)3 reports
  10. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$2.2M
    26 reports
  2. Monument Advocacy$480K
    14 reports
  3. THE VOGEL GROUP$350K
    6 reports
  4. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$190K
    7 reports
  5. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$170K
    7 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$269K65%
  2. Democratic$143.5K35%

PACs sponsored

  • PERATON CORP. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (A.K.A. 'PERATON PAC')$262.6K raised this cycle
  • THE GUIDEHOUSE INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GUIDEHOUSE PAC)$89K raised this cycle
  • CHROMALLOY CORPORATION/CHROMALLOY GAS TURBINE LLC PAC (CHROMALLOY PAC)$0 raised this cycle
  • APTIM CORP. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AKA APTIM PAC)$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.