Federal contractor · HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA

PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE PARTNERS, LLC

PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE PARTNERS, LLC received -$1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−262% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $11.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($584.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$1.1M
New awards
5
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
ZKZWX1WCK153
Parent company
PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE PARTNERS, INC
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 161.6KFY2017
  2. 147.5KFY2018
  3. 1.6MFY2019
  4. 2.6MFY2020
  5. 2.1MFY2021
  6. 1.8MFY2022
  7. 2MFY2023
  8. 2MFY2024
  9. 682.3KFY2025
  10. -1.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$584.4K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 30, 2022 – Sep 23, 2026· 70RDAD22FR0000133
  2. Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, AL· Education & social services· Sep 14, 2023 – May 8, 2026· FA330023F0072
  3. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Orange County, CA· Professional services· Sep 23, 2020 – Jan 14, 2026· 1605C420F00037
  4. Office of Justice Programs· Orange County, CA· Professional services· Aug 28, 2019 – Jul 10, 2026· 15PADH19F00000010
  5. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Apr 23, 2026 – May 13, 2026· 1605C226F00007

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $481K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $305.7K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $44.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $831.2K reported

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FAIRFAX, VA · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. LEESBURG, VA · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CANKAYA, TUR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.