Federal contractor · WAHIAWA, HI

PERRY MANAGEMENT CORP OF SOUTH DAKOTA, L.L.C

PERRY MANAGEMENT CORP OF SOUTH DAKOTA, L.L.C received $9.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 125 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $79.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($3.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.2M
New awards
125
Sole-source
9.3%
Single offer
0.1%
UEI
JM2FGF4JHMN3
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.4MFY2017
  2. 4.2MFY2018
  3. 4.1MFY2019
  4. 5.1MFY2020
  5. 7.8MFY2021
  6. 8.6MFY2022
  7. 9.3MFY2023
  8. 13.5MFY2024
  9. 13.7MFY2025
  10. 9.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 109 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 11 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$9.2M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition9.3%
    US 39% · $861K
  • Sole-source awards9.3%
    US 30% · $856.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.1%
    US 8.7% · $4,741
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Sep 3, 2025 – Apr 17, 2026· N6247825F0105
  2. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Mar 10, 2026 – May 26, 2026· FA301626F0103
  3. Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Mar 13, 2025 – Apr 13, 2026· N6247825F4027
  4. Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· N6247826F0056
  5. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· FA301626C0005
  6. REFUSE$637.2K
    Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Nov 26, 2025 – Nov 26, 2025· W912CN26FA039
  7. Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Jan 23, 2026 – Jan 23, 2026· W912CN26FA072
  8. Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· W912CN26FA240

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. YAMAKI CO., LTD.$31.3M+7.2% in FY2026
    KUMAGAYA-SHI, JPN · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collectionAir Force · Waste collection
  2. KURASHIKI, CO.,LTD.$24.6M−9.3% in FY2026
    OKINAWA-SHI, JPN · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collectionAir Force · Waste collection
  3. DORADO SERVICES, INC.$21.7M−17% in FY2026
    SANFORD, FL · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collectionAir Force · Waste collectionArmy · Waste collection

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.