Federal contractor · WAHIAWA, HI
PERRY MANAGEMENT CORP OF SOUTH DAKOTA, L.L.C
PERRY MANAGEMENT CORP OF SOUTH DAKOTA, L.L.C received $9.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 125 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $79.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($3.9M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $9.2M
- New awards
- 125
- Sole-source
- 9.3%
- Single offer
- 0.1%
- UEI
- JM2FGF4JHMN3
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 4.4MFY2017
- 4.2MFY2018
- 4.1MFY2019
- 5.1MFY2020
- 7.8MFY2021
- 8.6MFY2022
- 9.3MFY2023
- 13.5MFY2024
- 13.7MFY2025
- 9.2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$3.9M42%109 awards
- 2 awards
- Department of the Army$2.2M24%11 awards
- Department of Veterans Affairs$122.5K1.3%1 awards
- Defense Commissary Agency$69.6K0.8%1 awards
- Defense Logistics Agency-$64.9K0.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$9.2M100%
Where the work was performed
- Honolulu County, HI$6.3M68%
- Bexar County, TX$3M32%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition9.3%US 39% · $861K
- Sole-source awards9.3%US 30% · $856.3K
- Single-offer competitions0.1%US 8.7% · $4,741
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of the Air Force$733.8KDepartment of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Sep 3, 2025 – Apr 17, 2026· N6247825F0105
- Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Mar 10, 2026 – May 26, 2026· FA301626F0103
- Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Mar 13, 2025 – Apr 13, 2026· N6247825F4027
- Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· N6247826F0056
- Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· FA301626C0005
- REFUSE$637.2KDepartment of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Nov 26, 2025 – Nov 26, 2025· W912CN26FA039
- Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Jan 23, 2026 – Jan 23, 2026· W912CN26FA072
- Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Facilities & utilities· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· W912CN26FA240
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- YAMAKI CO., LTD.$31.3M+7.2% in FY2026KUMAGAYA-SHI, JPN · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collectionAir Force · Waste collection
- KURASHIKI, CO.,LTD.$24.6M−9.3% in FY2026OKINAWA-SHI, JPN · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collectionAir Force · Waste collection
- DORADO SERVICES, INC.$21.7M−17% in FY2026SANFORD, FL · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Waste collectionAir Force · Waste collectionArmy · Waste collection
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.