Federal contractor · BOZEMAN, MT

PETER & BAILEY INVESTMENTS LLLP

PETER & BAILEY INVESTMENTS LLLP received $962.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($962.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$962.2K
New awards
12
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
98%
UEI
ZGC9HHBW5F93
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 962.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$962.2K100%
    12 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$938.8K98%
  2. Facilities & utilities$23.4K2.4%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition98%
    US 39% · $938.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions98%
    US 8.7% · $938.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Construction & real property· Aug 20, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 1202RZ26M0804
  2. Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Construction & real property· Sep 3, 2026 – Sep 3, 2026· 1202RZ26M1287
  3. Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Construction & real property· Aug 7, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026· 1202RZ26M0937
  4. Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Construction & real property· Aug 14, 2026 – Sep 27, 2026· 1202RZ26M0902
  5. Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Construction & real property· Sep 6, 2026 – Sep 6, 2026· 1202RZ26M1134
  6. Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Construction & real property· Jul 29, 2026 – Jul 29, 2026· 1202RZ26M0686
  7. Forest Service· Beaverhead County, MT· Construction & real property· Aug 30, 2026 – Aug 30, 2026· 1202RZ26M0913
  8. Forest Service· Gallatin County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Apr 16, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· 1284LL26F0032

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ON THE GO SERVICES INC$910.9K+79% in FY2026
    RICHFIELD, UT · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. KELSO, WA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. LOWELL, MA · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.