Federal contractor · BLACKSBURG, VA

PHOENIX INTEGRATION, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for PHOENIX INTEGRATION, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $5.6M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
NQY4DFK14JN1
Parent company
ANSYS INC
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ANSYS INC company family: 8 registered entities, $43.7M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ANSYS INCCANONSBURG, PA · Family page
    $17.2M
  2. ANSYS GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES, LLCEXTON, PA
    $26.5M
  3. 3DSIM LLCPARK CITY, UT
    $0
  4. DELCROSS TECHNOLOGIES, LLCCHAMPAIGN, IL
    $0
  5. DFR SOLUTIONS, LLCBELTSVILLE, MD
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 471.3KFY2017
  2. 702.4KFY2018
  3. 1.4MFY2019
  4. 1.7MFY2020
  5. 806.1KFY2021
  6. 411.6KFY2022
  7. 168.8KFY2023

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for PHOENIX INTEGRATION, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $676.5K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · -$1.17 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

49 companies · $56.7M reported

  1. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$6.8M
    RESTON, VA · 29 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$5.4M
    LEXINGTON, MA · 35 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$4.6M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 16 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 49 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THE MATHWORKS, INC.$87.7M−42% in FY2026
    NATICK, MA · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Software publishersNavy · Software publishersAir Force · Software publishers+5 more
  2. CODE METAL, INC.$20.6M+40% in FY2026
    BOSTON, MA · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. TECHNERGETICS, LLC$22.2M−51% in FY2026
    UTICA, NY · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ANSYS INC (8 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • ANSYS, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$280K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.2M
$1.2M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$500K
    9 reports
  2. 2024$420K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$280K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$20K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense21 reports
  2. Aerospace6 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations6 reports
  4. Science and technology6 reports
  5. Trade (domestic and foreign)2 reports
  6. Education1 reports
  7. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES19 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE18 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)6 reports
  4. Natl Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)5 reports
  5. Energy - Dept of2 reports
  6. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)1 reports
  7. Natl Security Council (NSC)1 reports
  8. Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP)1 reports
  9. State - Dept of (DOS)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. DLA Piper LLP (US)$760K
    10 reports
  2. THE ARTEMIS GROUP, LLC (OKLAHOMA)$80K
    5 reports
  3. Alva Elliott Partners, LLC$0
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.