Federal contractor · LOS ANGELES, CA

PIH HEALTH GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL

No contract obligations recorded for PIH HEALTH GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL in FY2026. Since FY2019: $544.7K. Its largest customer was Drug Enforcement Administration ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
NNGVFW63DFB8
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 74.3KFY2019
  2. 136.2KFY2021
  3. 89.3KFY2022
  4. 80.3KFY2023
  5. 80.3KFY2024
  6. 84.3KFY2025
  7. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Drug Enforcement Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 8, 2026 – Sep 8, 2026· 15DDHQ26P00000954

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PIH HEALTH GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$100K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 100KFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 0FY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2024.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $30.8K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF$30.8K100%
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $37.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $36.7K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $271.5K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $5.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $34.8K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $30.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $6.1M reported

  1. MATHER, CA · 1 subaward
  2. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY$762.6K
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 2 subawards
  3. LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF$213.5K
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 7 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SANTA CLARA LAND CO LTD$155.1K+5% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDrug Enforcement Administration · Lessors of real estate
  2. 2 PIERCE, LLC$152.3K+3% in FY2026
    ITASCA, IL · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDrug Enforcement Administration · Lessors of real estate
  3. NEW YORK, NY · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDrug Enforcement Administration · Lessors of real estate

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • PIH Health Foundation (fka PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital)AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2023
$120K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2024
$120K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$0
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Agriculture7 reports
  2. Alcohol and drug abuse7 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations7 reports
  4. Disaster planning and emergencies7 reports
  5. Health issues7 reports
  6. Homeland security7 reports
  7. Medical and disease research, clinical labs7 reports
  8. Telecommunications7 reports

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, P.C.$120K
    7 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.