Federal contractor · BOSTON, MA

PISON TECHNOLOGY, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for PISON TECHNOLOGY, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2018: $15.5M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
EVMCKM9G1Y65
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 125KFY2018
  2. 265KFY2019
  3. 150KFY2020
  4. 2.2MFY2021
  5. 4.9MFY2022
  6. 2.6MFY2023
  7. 5.3MFY2024
  8. 0FY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for PISON TECHNOLOGY, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PISON TECHNOLOGY, INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$1.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.2MFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 0FY2023
  4. 459.1KFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MASSIVE LIGHT LLC$3.2M−100% in FY2026
    SPRING, TX · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Scientific research and development services
  2. OVERMATCH, INC.$5M−100% in FY2026
    PLANO, TX · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Scientific research and development services
  3. BEAVERCREEK TOWNSHIP, OH · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Pison Technology, Inc.AI match · 100%
  • Pison TechnologiesAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$80K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$300K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$130K
    7 reports
  2. 2024$90K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$80K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$0
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense14 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations12 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES11 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE11 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Sachem Strategies$300K
    12 reports
  2. Tidal Strategies, LLC$0
    3 reports
  3. C. Baker Consulting, Inc.$0
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.