Federal contractor · OLATHE, KS

POOLE FIRE PROTECTION, INC.

POOLE FIRE PROTECTION, INC. received -$213.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−418% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $871.5K. Its largest customer was National Park Service ($29.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$213.1K
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
DUHZCTQHSJ71
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -125.2KFY2017
  2. 36.5KFY2020
  3. 187.5KFY2021
  4. 48.5KFY2022
  5. 206.3KFY2023
  6. 663.9KFY2024
  7. 67.1KFY2025
  8. -213.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Park Service$29.5K0.0%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy-$242.6K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

  1. Apache County, AZ$29.5K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. HUTR REPLACE FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM$189.5K
    National Park Service· Apache County, AZ· Construction & real property· Jun 17, 2025 – Jul 14, 2026· 140P1525F0024
  2. HANGAR FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF PROTECTION CRITERIA AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND$7,291
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 12, 2024 – Feb 17, 2026· N6274224F0348

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $90.1K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. OCULUS-IMEG JV, LLP$90.1K100%
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $894.5K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $537.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $90.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

17 companies · $9.3M reported

  1. STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC.$6.2M
    MUSCATINE, IA · 13 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PREMIER STANLEY JV LLC$800.8K
    CHANDLER, AZ · 8 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STANLEY - SETIADI JOINT VENTURE$349.5K
    MAITE, GU · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RATHS RATHS & JOHNSON INC$522K−102% in FY2026
    WILLOWBROOK, IL · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Park Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesPublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. T&E TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$417.5K
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HKS WSP JOINT VENTURE$438.4K
    DALLAS, TX · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.