Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

PORT FIDALGO CONSTRUCTORS INC

PORT FIDALGO CONSTRUCTORS INC received $268.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−61% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $51.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($231.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$268.9K
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JHGKN6MMWDM4
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $268.9K in FY2026 together.

  1. PORT FIDALGO CONSTRUCTORS INCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $268.9K
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 12MFY2020
  2. 28.9MFY2021
  3. 1.8MFY2022
  4. 6.8MFY2023
  5. 910.7KFY2024
  6. 681.1KFY2025
  7. 268.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$268.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $268.9K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $268.9K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Aug 19, 2021 – Mar 31, 2026· W912BV21C0016
  2. Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 7, 2023 – May 7, 2026· FA813723F0049
  3. Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 17, 2025 – Dec 16, 2025· FA813725F0046

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DSB-RLR II JOINT VENTURE LLC$1.9M−100% in FY2026
    AMERICAN FORK, UT · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  2. RAND & JONES ENTERPRISES CO, INC$1.8M−100% in FY2026
    BUFFALO, NY · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  3. KINGSTRUCTION, INC$1.8M−100% in FY2026
    CRESTVIEW, FL · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.