Federal contractor · PALMER, AK
PORT GRAHAM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PORT GRAHAM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION received $1.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (+31% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.3M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($827.6K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.4M
- New awards
- 11
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 42%
- UEI
- NAHNHCECQLB8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.5MFY2017
- -612.7KFY2018
- -8.1KFY2020
- 344KFY2022
- 428.1KFY2023
- 1.1MFY2024
- 1.1MFY2025
- 1.4MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Federal Aviation Administration$827.6K58%10 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Equipment maintenance$827.6K58%
- IT & telecom$589.8K42%
Where the work was performed
- Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK$589.8K42%
- St. Tammany Parish, LA$103.9K7.3%
- Ottawa County, MI$103.8K7.3%
- Haskell County, KS$100.8K7.1%
- Mobile County, AL$92.5K6.5%
- Turner County, GA$92.1K6.5%
- Lehigh County, PA$90K6.3%
- Livingston County, NY$87.2K6.2%
- Platte County, MO$80.4K5.7%
- Cuyahoga County, OH$79.9K5.6%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition42%US 39% · $589.8K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions42%US 8.7% · $589.8K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK· IT & telecom· Aug 9, 2024 – Aug 18, 2026· 140A1624C0010
- Federal Aviation Administration· St. Tammany Parish, LA· Equipment maintenance· Dec 12, 2025 – Dec 12, 2025· 6973GH26F00169
- Federal Aviation Administration· Ottawa County, MI· Equipment maintenance· Mar 5, 2026 – Mar 5, 2026· 6973GH26F00484
- Federal Aviation Administration· Haskell County, KS· Equipment maintenance· Sep 11, 2026 – Sep 11, 2026· 6973GH26F01391
- Federal Aviation Administration· Saginaw County, MI· Equipment maintenance· Sep 17, 2025 – Feb 6, 2026· 6973GH25F01406
- Federal Aviation Administration· Mobile County, AL· Equipment maintenance· Dec 12, 2025 – Dec 12, 2025· 6973GH26F00016
- Federal Aviation Administration· Turner County, GA· Equipment maintenance· Apr 21, 2026 – Apr 21, 2026· 6973GH26F00673
- Federal Aviation Administration· Lehigh County, PA· Equipment maintenance· Jul 16, 2026 – Jul 16, 2026· 6973GH26F01065
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- MILLSAP ELECTRIC, INC.$2.4M−79% in FY2026NORMAN, OK · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Building equipment contractors
- COWBOY ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC$3.1M−100% in FY2026NEW BRAUNFELS, TX · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Building equipment contractors
- ARNOLD ELECTRIC INC$3.8M+68% in FY2026TULSA, OK · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Aviation Administration · Building equipment contractors
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.