Federal contractor · PORTLAND, OR

PORT OF PORTLAND

PORT OF PORTLAND received $12.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−60% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $208.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($12.9M). It also received $44.2M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$12.9M
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HX4FCHE2H1M3
Parent company
PORT OF PORTLAND (INC)
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 12.1MFY2017
  2. 23.2MFY2018
  3. 22.5MFY2019
  4. 11.4MFY2020
  5. 24.9MFY2021
  6. 21.7MFY2022
  7. 24.8MFY2023
  8. 22.5MFY2024
  9. 32.3MFY2025
  10. 12.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$12.9M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $12.9M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $12.9M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Multnomah County, OR· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2025 – May 29, 2026· W9127N25FA059

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PORT OF PORTLAND received $44.2M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 18 actions (13 new awards), +19% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 20.116 · Airport Improvement Program ($21.7M).

Assistance · FY2026
$44.2M
New awards
13
Actions
18
Since FY2021
$297M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 98.2MFY2021
  2. 22.8MFY2022
  3. 40.3MFY2023
  4. 54.5MFY2024
  5. 37.1MFY2025
  6. 44.2MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$44.1M99.9%
  2. Direct payments$32.7K0.1%

Top programs

  1. 20.116 · Airport Improvement Program$21.7M49%
  2. 20.117 · Airport Infrastructure Grants$16.2M37%
  3. 20.118 · Airport Terminal Program$4.1M9.3%
  4. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs$2.1M4.6%
  5. 21.016 · Equitable Sharing$32.7K0.1%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Transportation
  2. Department of the Treasury

Largest awards

  1. 20.823 · Port Infrastructure Development Program· Maritime Administration· Project grant· Jan 2, 2024 – Mar 24, 2026· 693JF72344022
  2. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Jul 24, 2025 – Aug 20, 2026· 34100480992025
  3. 20.116 · Airport Improvement Program· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Aug 6, 2026 – Aug 6, 2026· 34100481062026
  4. 20.117 · Airport Infrastructure Grants· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Aug 3, 2026 – Aug 3, 2026· 34100481032026
  5. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Aug 13, 2024 – Jul 8, 2026· 34100480942024
  6. 20.116 · Airport Improvement Program· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Sep 14, 2026 – Sep 14, 2026· 34100250362026

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $420 received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3.8M received
  • FY2024: $2.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $882K paid out · $343.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

13 companies · $3.1M reported

  1. PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1.4M
    PORTLAND, OR · 1 subaward
  2. WORKSYSTEMS, INC.$786K
    PORTLAND, OR · 1 subaward
  3. GLACIER PEAK INSTITUTE$225K
    DARRINGTON, WA · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $4.1M reported

  1. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT$3.8M
    SALEM, OR · 2 subawards
  2. OREGON MILITARY DEPARTMENT$309.3K
    SALEM, OR · 2 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHEBOYGAN, MI · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. BRICE CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS, INC.$64M−53% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. THREE OAKS CONSTRUCTION, INC$63.4M−40% in FY2026
    NORTH SIOUX CITY, SD · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • PORT OF PORTLANDAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$355.3K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.2M
$1.1M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$322K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$320K
    7 reports
  3. 2025$355.3K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$192.3K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Aviation, aircraft and airlines27 reports
  2. Marine, maritime, boating and fisheries24 reports
  3. Transportation22 reports
  4. Economics and economic development19 reports
  5. Environment and Superfund18 reports
  6. Homeland security16 reports
  7. Budget and appropriations12 reports
  8. Trade (domestic and foreign)10 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES27 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE26 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. K&L GATES LLP$760K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.