Federal contractor · BERNE, IN

POSEIDON,LLC

POSEIDON,LLC received $38.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−78% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $18.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($20.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$38.9K
New awards
3
Sole-source
53%
Single offer
47%
UEI
TCYEPH3BN7L6
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 116KFY2017
  2. 1.3MFY2019
  3. 1.3MFY2020
  4. 10.5MFY2021
  5. 3.4MFY2022
  6. 1.5MFY2023
  7. -105.9KFY2024
  8. 175.7KFY2025
  9. 38.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$20.8K53%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$18.1K47%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$20.8K53%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$18.1K47%

Where the work was performed

  1. Matagorda County, TX$20.8K53%
  2. Camden County, GA$18.1K47%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $38.9K
  • Sole-source awards53%
    US 30% · $20.8K
  • Single-offer competitions47%
    US 8.8% · $18.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$20.8K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. BRANDY STATION SPUD RENTAL$57K
    Department of the Army· Matagorda County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Feb 20, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W912PM26PA035
  2. POSEIDON BARGE MATERIALS$18.1K
    Department of the Navy· Camden County, GA· Other equipment & supplies· May 20, 2026 – May 20, 2026· N4446626P0059
  3. MPV BRANDY STATION - RENT (2) 18" X 60' LONG SPUDS$15.4K
    Department of the Army· Matagorda County, TX· Equipment maintenance· May 28, 2025 – Apr 20, 2026· W912PM25P0053

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $209.1K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $678K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $258.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $1.1M reported

  1. 381 CONSTRUCTORS$719.7K
    OMAHA, NE · 9 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. THE DUTRA GROUP$216.4K
    SAN RAFAEL, CA · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. MANSON CONSTRUCTION CO$134.9K
    SEATTLE, WA · 2 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC$106.8K−178% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing
  2. PT. ANUGRAH MAPALUS PERSADA$112K
    JAKARTA PUSAT, IDN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing
  3. MIKE BEELER EQUIPMENT SERVICES INC$98K−100% in FY2026
    WILLIAMSTOWN, NJ · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other general purpose machinery manufacturingArmy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.