Federal contractor · BISHOP, CA

PREFERRED SEPTIC & DISPOSAL, INC.

PREFERRED SEPTIC & DISPOSAL, INC. received $28.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−0.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $527.3K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($28.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$28.5K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CMEVRTX7L5N5
Parent company
BAY DISPOSAL, LLC
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the HAROLD LEMAY ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED company family: 74 registered entities, $10.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $6.2M
  2. $801.4K
  3. $472.9K
  4. $370.6K
  5. $359.6K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 35.8KFY2017
  2. 60.4KFY2018
  3. 61.6KFY2019
  4. 41.3KFY2020
  5. 225.5KFY2021
  6. 6.2KFY2022
  7. 42.5KFY2023
  8. -3.1KFY2024
  9. 28.6KFY2025
  10. 28.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$25.2K88%
  2. Facilities & utilities$3,35612%

Where the work was performed

  1. Inyo County, CA$28.5K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Inyo County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 7, 2023 – Feb 24, 2026· 140L1223P0021
  2. Bureau of Land Management· Inyo County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 20, 2023 – Aug 26, 2026· 140L1223P0025

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.6M reported

  1. ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. GROTON, CT · 9 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 31 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GALVESTON, TX · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection
  2. NATIVE SERVICES LLC$9.7M−6.4% in FY2026
    DUNN, NC · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection
  3. DONATO MARANGI, INC$9.6M+39% in FY2026
    VALLEY COTTAGE, NY · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of HAROLD LEMAY ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED (74 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Waste Connections US, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$620K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$830K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$210K
    2 reports
  2. 2026$620K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Environment and Superfund6 reports
  2. Energy and nuclear3 reports
  3. Fuel, gas and oil3 reports
  4. Waste (hazardous, solid, interstate, nuclear)3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES6 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Miller Strategies, LLC$590K
    3 reports
  2. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$240K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.