Federal contractor · AUSTIN, TX

PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.

PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SERVICES, INC. received $186.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 107 awards (−31% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.7B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($99.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$186.6M
New awards
107
Sole-source
99.6%
Single offer
0.4%
UEI
T4T8AHYNF9V3
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 118MFY2017
  2. 132MFY2018
  3. 141.3MFY2019
  4. 152.3MFY2020
  5. 155.9MFY2021
  6. 174MFY2022
  7. 190.4MFY2023
  8. 220.5MFY2024
  9. 269.3MFY2025
  10. 186.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 17 awards
  2. 67 awards
  3. 4 awards
  4. 9 awards
  5. 7 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$102.7M55%
  2. Professional services$28M15%
  3. Health & medical$25.5M14%
  4. Construction & real property$15.6M8.4%
  5. Transportation & logistics$12.4M6.6%
  6. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$2.3M1.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $186.6M
  • Sole-source awards99.6%
    US 30% · $185.7M
  • Single-offer competitions0.4%
    US 8.8% · $820.2K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 53 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  4. Department of Homeland Security · 3 awards
  5. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 28, 2017 – Apr 3, 2026· W9124L17C0005
  2. Department of the Army· Macomb County, MI· Construction & real property· Sep 28, 2020 – Apr 10, 2026· W56HZV20CL859
  3. Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Transportation & logistics· Jan 31, 2022 – Jun 9, 2026· FA810122C0001
  4. Department of the Army· Hardin County, KY· Facilities & utilities· Jul 31, 2025 – May 28, 2026· W9124D25CA032
  5. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 26, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· W9124L25FA020
  6. Department of the Navy· Travis County, TX· Construction & real property· Apr 4, 2025 – Mar 24, 2026· N4008525F5112
  7. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Oct 28, 2022 – Mar 23, 2026· N5523623C0002
  8. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 11, 2021 – May 7, 2026· N0018921C0006

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $134.9K (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. LAWTON, OK · 1 subaward
  2. EL PASO, TX · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.1% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $184.4K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $13.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $10.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $134.9K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

41 companies · $23.6M reported

  1. RALEIGH, NC · 3 subawards · Special food services
  2. WICHITA FALLS, TX · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
  3. CHESAPEAKE, VA · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 17 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LOYALTY SUPPORT SERVICES$288.9M−44% in FY2026
    AMMAN, JOR · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support servicesAir Force · Facilities support services
  2. SKOOKUM EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS$715.3M+12% in FY2026
    BREMERTON, WA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support servicesNavy · Facilities support servicesArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings+2 more
  3. TIYA SERVICES, L.L.C.$188.6M−38% in FY2026
    BATON ROUGE, LA · 2 entities · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.