Federal contractor · BURLINGTON, MA

PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION

PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION received -$13K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−113% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $522.4K. Its largest customer was Department of State ($1,299).

Obligations · FY2026
-$13K
New awards
4
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
QEGQJA81C7R2
Parent company
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the IONA TECHNOLOGIES INC company family: 3 registered entities, -$13K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. IONA TECHNOLOGIES INCWALTHAM, MA · Family page
    $0
  2. TELERIK INC.WALTHAM, MA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9.6KFY2017
  2. 3.8KFY2018
  3. 103.1KFY2019
  4. 58KFY2020
  5. 28.7KFY2021
  6. 69.2KFY2022
  7. 100.7KFY2023
  8. 65.3KFY2024
  9. 97KFY2025
  10. -13KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of State · 1 awards
  2. Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Middlesex County, MA· IT & telecom· Jul 31, 2025 – Nov 13, 2025· N6449825P2114
  2. Department of State· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Feb 27, 2026 – Feb 27, 2026· 19AQMM26P0329
  3. Drug Enforcement Administration· Middlesex County, MA· IT & telecom· Jan 15, 2026 – Feb 17, 2026· 15DDHQ26P00000153
  4. Department of the Navy· Middlesex County, MA· IT & telecom· Jul 16, 2025 – Oct 17, 2025· N6893625P5173

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $92.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $800.4K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $65.3K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $201.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $1.2M reported

  1. SPARKS, NV · 3 subawards · Software publishers
  2. TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. FAIRFIELD, NJ · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AVANTIX, LLC$120K−33% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, CA · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishersNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. WIPL-D (USA), LLC$109.4K−9% in FY2026
    WEST HARTFORD, CT · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Computer systems design and related services
  3. FORT WORTH, TX · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.