Federal contractor · SCOBEY, MT

PROJECT TELEPHONE COMPANY

No contract obligations recorded for PROJECT TELEPHONE COMPANY in FY2026. Since FY2017: $127.7K. It also received $233.8K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
PTVEPVDJH2K5
Parent company
NEMONT TELEPHONE CO-OPERATIVE INC
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the NEMONT TELEPHONE CO-OPERATIVE INC company family: 2 registered entities, $313K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. NEMONT TELEPHONE CO-OPERATIVE INCSCOBEY, MT · Family page
    $313K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 21.6KFY2017
  2. 38.7KFY2018
  3. 24.4KFY2019
  4. 43.4KFY2020
  5. -406.7FY2021

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for PROJECT TELEPHONE COMPANY in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

PROJECT TELEPHONE COMPANY received $233.8K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 24 actions (0 new awards), −99% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 32.002 · Universal Service Fund - High Cost ($221.7K).

Assistance · FY2026
$233.8K
New awards
0
Actions
24
Since FY2021
$43.6M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 144.4KFY2021
  2. 8.9MFY2022
  3. 8.7MFY2023
  4. 332.2KFY2024
  5. 25.3MFY2025
  6. 233.8KFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$233.8K100%

Top programs

  1. 32.002 · Universal Service Fund - High Cost$221.7K95%
  2. 32.003 · Universal Service Fund - Lifeline$12K5.2%

Awarding agencies

  1. Federal Communications Commission$233.8K100%

Largest awards

  1. THE HIGH COST PROGRAM PROVIDES FUNDING TO COMPANIES WORKING TO EXPAND CONNECTIVITY IN UNSERVED OR UNDERSERVED AREAS$2M
    32.002 · Universal Service Fund - High Cost· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Oct 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2026· HC-143002539-482250-CAFICC
  2. THE LIFELINE PROGRAM HELPS MAKE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES MORE AFFORDABLE FOR LOW-INCOME CONSUMERS$113.5K
    32.003 · Universal Service Fund - Lifeline· Federal Communications Commission· Direct payment for specified use· Nov 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2026· LI-143002539-482250

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $1.6M reported

  1. NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF$1.6M
    BISMARCK, ND · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SACRED WIND COMMUNICATIONS, INC.$618.9K+131% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Wired telecommunications carriersBureau of Reclamation · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. PAUL BUNYAN RURAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE$841.4K−27% in FY2026
    BEMIDJI, MN · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Wired telecommunications carriers
  3. RANGE TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC$343.5K−13% in FY2026
    FORSYTH, MT · 3 entities · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Wired telecommunications carriersBureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education · Wired telecommunications carriers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.