Federal contractor · WAIPAHU, HI

PURAL WATER SPECIALTY CO. , INC.

PURAL WATER SPECIALTY CO. , INC. received $245.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−94% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $43.8M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($231.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$245.1K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FW9JCAN99FM9
Small businessMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.7MFY2017
  2. 3.5MFY2018
  3. 3.9MFY2019
  4. 4MFY2020
  5. 7.1MFY2021
  6. 3.9MFY2022
  7. 7.6MFY2023
  8. 4.6MFY2024
  9. 4.4MFY2025
  10. 245.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$231.2K94%
    1 awards
  2. U.S. Coast Guard$13.9K5.7%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$231.2K94%
  2. Construction & real property$13.9K5.7%

Where the work was performed

  1. Hawaii County, HI$231.2K94%
  2. Honolulu County, HI$13.9K5.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $245.1K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $245.1K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. U.S. Coast Guard$13.9K
    Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF W9124J-17-C-0005, AWARDED ON JAN 23, 2017, DUE TO THE TRANSFER OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. THE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE IS OCT 1, 2016 TO FEB 28, 2029 (149 MONTHS).$29.3M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Hawaii County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Mar 17, 2021 – Jun 2, 2026· SP060021C8345
  2. ASBP WATER VALVE REPAIR$13.9K
    U.S. Coast Guard· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Jun 10, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· 70Z03426PHONO0162

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $186.8K reported

  1. NAKUPUNA SOLUTIONS, LLC$105.6K
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. M. C. DEAN, INC.$81.2K
    TYSONS, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HARNETT, COUNTY OF NORTH CAROLINA$9.2M−4.5% in FY2026
    LILLINGTON, NC · 99.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Water, sewage and other systems
  2. FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION$9.2M−5.7% in FY2026
    FAYETTEVILLE, NC · 99.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Water, sewage and other systems
  3. CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO$11.7M−1.4% in FY2026
    SAN JOSE, CA · 3 entities · 99.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Water, sewage and other systems

Showing the top 3 of 24 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.