Federal contractor · PYEONGTAEK-SI

PYUNGIL ENVIRONMENT CO.,LTD.

PYUNGIL ENVIRONMENT CO.,LTD. received $15.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−74% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($15.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$15.2K
New awards
7
Sole-source
55%
Single offer
14%
UEI
TD4EUJ7X5P55
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2017
  2. 609.1KFY2018
  3. 435.3KFY2019
  4. 212.3KFY2020
  5. 65.1KFY2021
  6. -90.7FY2022
  7. 22.5KFY2023
  8. 63.6KFY2024
  9. 59.5KFY2025
  10. 15.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$8,45955%
  2. Equipment maintenance$6,56443%
  3. Construction & real property$2201.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$15.2K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition69%
    US 39% · $10.5K
  • Sole-source awards55%
    US 30% · $8,459
  • Single-offer competitions14%
    US 8.8% · $2,074
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Feb 1, 2026 – Feb 1, 2026· W91QVN26FC120
  2. Department of the Army· Equipment maintenance· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· W91QVN26FC077
  3. Department of the Army· Equipment maintenance· Mar 4, 2026 – Mar 4, 2026· W91QVN26FA339
  4. Department of the Army· Equipment maintenance· Mar 3, 2026 – Mar 3, 2026· W91QVN26FA333
  5. Department of the Army· Equipment maintenance· Feb 22, 2026 – Feb 22, 2026· W91QVN26FA313
  6. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Jan 14, 2026 – Mar 17, 2026· W91QVN26FA222
  7. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Mar 9, 2026 – Mar 17, 2026· W91QVN26FA343

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KIM JOHNSON$120.8K+1% in FY2026
    NEW ROCKFORD, ND · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. PERRYSBURG, OH · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. NORCROSS, GA · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.