Federal contractor · LEAMINGTON SPA

Q.E.D. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS LIMITED

No contract obligations recorded for Q.E.D. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS LIMITED in FY2026. Since FY2017: $3.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
SVMNFSJCVUQ3
Parent company
GRACO INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $166.8K in FY2026 together.

  1. Q.E.D. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS LIMITEDLEAMINGTON SPA, GBR · Family page
    $0
  2. $166.8K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.5MFY2017
  2. 49.9KFY2018
  3. 1.3MFY2019
  4. 101.6KFY2020
  5. 192.2KFY2021
  6. 98.8KFY2022
  7. 231.3KFY2023
  8. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 6, 2017 – Oct 16, 2025· N0010417PNF32

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $482.9K reported

  1. LOS ANGELES, CA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. FREDERICK, MD · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
  3. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HAMPTON, VA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
  2. CHULA VISTA, CA · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
  3. INDUSTRIAL DYNAMICS LLC$367.1K−100% in FY2026
    SUFFOLK, VA · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.