Federal contractor · WESTLAKE, OH

Q-LAB CORP

Q-LAB CORP received $29K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−83% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Reclamation ($30.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$29K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
E17WLYP194M6
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 47.9KFY2017
  2. 120.4KFY2018
  3. 160KFY2019
  4. 190KFY2020
  5. 182.8KFY2021
  6. 46.1KFY2022
  7. 5.6KFY2023
  8. 109.8KFY2024
  9. 172.9KFY2025
  10. 29KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$30.2K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$1,158
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$1,158
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Cuyahoga County, OH· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 21, 2025 – Feb 13, 2026· SP470625P0011
  2. Bureau of Reclamation· Jefferson County, CO· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 7, 2026 – Jul 13, 2026· 140R4026P0072
  3. National Institute of Standards and Technology· Cuyahoga County, OH· Professional services· Jul 7, 2023 – Mar 17, 2026· 1333ND23PNB730297

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $33.3K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. STERLING HEIGHTS, MI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $95.7K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $161.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $168.5K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $33.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $1.6M reported

  1. DAYTON, OH · 8 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. HOLLYWOOD, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INNOVATEST USA CO$383.5K−100% in FY2026
    HORSHAM, PA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. WEST CHESTER, PA · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. PROVO, UT · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.