Federal contractor · FREDERICKSBURG, VA

QRC, LLC

QRC, LLC received $445.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−59% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $41.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($445.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$445.8K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
QLDPLL13BRK9
Parent company
THE PARSONS CORPORATION
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. company family: 9 registered entities, $15.7M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.SAN DIEGO, CA · Family page
    $3.4M
  2. $6.4M
  3. $4.2M
  4. $1.2M
  5. $49K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.5MFY2017
  2. 11.3MFY2018
  3. 7.5MFY2019
  4. 8.8MFY2020
  5. 3.5MFY2021
  6. 1.1MFY2022
  7. 2.3MFY2023
  8. 861.2KFY2024
  9. 1.1MFY2025
  10. 445.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$445.8K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $445.8K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $445.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Fredericksburg city, VA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 15, 2026 – Apr 15, 2026· W911QY26CA024

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $242.9K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $102.9K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $224.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $433.3K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $192.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4 companies · $462.1K reported

  1. CHOTEAU, MT · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. THE SCHREIFER GROUP, LLC$160.2K
    WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. IRVINE, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

23 companies · $90.2M reported

  1. BETHESDA, MD · 109 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 7 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
  3. CARLSBAD, CA · 5 subawards · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 12 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ROGERS, LOVELOCK & FRITZ, INC.$114.5M−76% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 3 entities · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. AERMOR LLC$104.4M−59% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.$260.5M−45% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 56 entities · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesPublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services+2 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. (9 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO CORPORATIONAI match · 99%
PAC giving · 2026
$3,000
1 PAC

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$2,00067%
  2. Democratic$1,00033%

PACs sponsored

  • FED - MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL PAC)$146.9K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.