Federal contractor · TULSA, OK

R & D MAINTENANCE SERVICES INC

R & D MAINTENANCE SERVICES INC received $20.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−49% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $314.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($20.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$20.3M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
38%
UEI
R759RF3GV7B5
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 21.8MFY2017
  2. 29.6MFY2018
  3. 24MFY2019
  4. 30.1MFY2020
  5. 25.6MFY2021
  6. 31.5MFY2022
  7. 31MFY2023
  8. 60.8MFY2024
  9. 39.9MFY2025
  10. 20.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$20.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition38%
    US 39% · $7.8M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions38%
    US 8.7% · $7.8M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Tuscaloosa County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Jul 2, 2021 – Jun 11, 2026· W9127821C0018
  2. Department of the Army· Lowndes County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Aug 13, 2020 – Apr 30, 2026· W9127820C0018
  3. Department of the Army· McCormick County, SC· Facilities & utilities· Jan 26, 2024 – Dec 16, 2025· W912HN24C5002
  4. Department of the Army· Bartow County, GA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 18, 2024 – May 21, 2026· W9127824C0021
  5. Department of the Army· Lowndes County, MS· Facilities & utilities· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· W9127826FA137
  6. Department of the Army· Hart County, GA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 13, 2026 – Mar 13, 2026· W912HN26CA020

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NIKA TECHNOLOGIES INC$114.7M+49% in FY2026
    ROCKVILLE, MD · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services
  2. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 2 entities · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services
  3. VANQUISH WORLDWIDE L.L.C.$100.6M−30% in FY2026
    MARYVILLE, TN · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.