Federal contractor · WOODSTOCK, GA

R-DEX SYSTEMS, INC.

R-DEX SYSTEMS, INC. received $4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−40% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $36.3M. Its largest customer was Missile Defense Agency ($2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
62%
UEI
HD9RM38CWBM6
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 375KFY2017
  2. 274.9KFY2018
  3. 225KFY2019
  4. 2.1MFY2020
  5. 1.8MFY2021
  6. 10.3MFY2022
  7. 5.1MFY2023
  8. 5.4MFY2024
  9. 6.7MFY2025
  10. 4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$4M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition62%
    US 39% · $2.5M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions62%
    US 8.8% · $2.5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Cherokee County, GA· Research & development· Sep 17, 2024 – Apr 9, 2026· W5170124C0284
  2. Department of the Navy· Cherokee County, GA· Research & development· Sep 27, 2023 – Mar 6, 2026· N6833523C0735
  3. Department of the Army· Cherokee County, GA· Research & development· Jul 15, 2025 – May 14, 2026· W5170125CA193
  4. Missile Defense Agency· Cherokee County, GA· Research & development· Apr 14, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· HQ086026CE049
  5. Department of the Army· Cherokee County, GA· Research & development· Apr 3, 2026 – May 11, 2026· W5170126CA076
  6. Department of the Air Force· Cherokee County, GA· Research & development· Mar 16, 2026 – Mar 16, 2026· FA238526PB001
  7. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF629

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AURA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$10.6M−77% in FY2026
    DURHAM, NC · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. NEXCEPTA INC$9.4M+192% in FY2026
    GAITHERSBURG, MD · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services+1 more
  3. OVERLAND AI INC$10.6M−12% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.