Federal contractor · RIDGEFIELD, CT

R4 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for R4 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2023: $5.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
KSTJCSG7YMW8
Parent company
R4 TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 448.6KFY2023
  2. 5.4MFY2024
  3. 0FY2025
  4. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. LEVERAGING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE/MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS TO ENHANCE AIR FORCE SPECIAL WARFARE RECRUITING$1.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT· Research & development· Mar 6, 2024 – Dec 15, 2025· FA864924P0618

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2.5M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $69K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $8.7M reported

  1. ECS FEDERAL, LLC$7.5M
    FAIRFAX, VA · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR MANUFACTURING SCIENCES INC$1.2M
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 2 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LEXSET.AI INC$5.3M−3.6% in FY2026
    BROOKLYN, NY · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. TURBINEONE INC$5M+552% in FY2026
    SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 2 entities · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. MESODYNE INC$5.8M−100% in FY2026
    SOMERVILLE, MA · 99.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • R4 Technologies, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$80K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$280K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$80K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$80K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$80K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$40K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense19 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations18 reports
  3. Homeland security14 reports
  4. Agriculture9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES23 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE23 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)12 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$280K
    14 reports
  2. DiNino Associates, LLC$0
    10 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.