Federal contractor · OLD BRIDGE, NJ
RAAD CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
RAAD CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC received $2.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+19% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $68.4M. Its largest customer was Smithsonian Institution ($973.9K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.5M
- New awards
- 9
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- PB75ZXSP5534
- Parent company
- RAAD CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 4.5MFY2017
- 14.7MFY2018
- 6MFY2019
- 3.3MFY2020
- 17.6MFY2021
- 7.3MFY2022
- 3.4MFY2023
- 6.9MFY2024
- 2.1MFY2025
- 2.5MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Smithsonian Institution$973.9K39%3 awards
- Department of the Air Force$830.9K33%5 awards
- Forest Service$724.7K29%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$2.5M100%
Where the work was performed
- New York County, NY$949.2K38%
- Charleston County, SC$811.3K32%
- 72$724.7K29%
- District of Columbia, DC$24.7K1.0%
- Berkeley County, SC$19.6K0.8%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications16%US 5.1% · $405.3K
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Smithsonian Institution· New York County, NY· Construction & real property· Sep 22, 2021 – Aug 5, 2026· 33330221FF0010477
- Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Dec 20, 2023 – Jul 16, 2026· 33330224FF0010079
- Smithsonian Institution· New York County, NY· Construction & real property· Nov 19, 2024 – Aug 13, 2026· 33330225FF0010033
- Department of the Air Force· Charleston County, SC· Construction & real property· Feb 27, 2026 – Feb 27, 2026· FA441826F0035
- Department of the Air Force· Charleston County, SC· Construction & real property· Jun 4, 2026 – Jun 4, 2026· FA441826F0075
- Department of the Air Force· Charleston County, SC· Construction & real property· Mar 5, 2026 – Mar 5, 2026· FA441826F0038
- Department of the Air Force· Berkeley County, SC· Construction & real property· Aug 29, 2025 – Feb 12, 2026· FA441825F0093
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $183.1K reported
- CENTERVILLE, UT · 1 subaward · Technical and trade schools
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- ZEN ASSOCIATES, INC.$5.5MWOBURN, MA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Nonresidential building construction
- KUNKEL CONSTRUCTION, INC.$6.8M−79% in FY2026PANAMA, PAN · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Nonresidential building construction
- CONSTRUCTORA ROGERS, S.A. (CONROSA)$4.7M−77% in FY2026PANAMA, PAN · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.