Federal contractor · AL QIBLA

RAOKHAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY WLL

RAOKHAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANY WLL received $957.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $4.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($957.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$957.2K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NQKXYMJHHNN7
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 52.8KFY2019
  2. 503KFY2020
  3. 266.1KFY2021
  4. 193.8KFY2022
  5. 475.8KFY2023
  6. 1MFY2024
  7. 840.5KFY2025
  8. 957.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$957.2K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$937.2K98%
  2. Equipment maintenance$20K2.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$937.2K98%
  2. United States$20K2.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ASAB CUSTODIAL$3.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Facilities & utilities· Dec 22, 2022 – Jan 21, 2026· FA570323P0007
  2. FY 25 ASAB HOODS AND DUCTS CLEANING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHED PWS$39.7K
    Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· Feb 2, 2025 – Jan 21, 2026· FA570325C0001

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AHRMDCO INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C.$2.6M+1% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. HOKAMA CO., LTD.$2.8M−29% in FY2026
    KIN-CHO, JPN · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. GIVA S.R.L.$2.3M−1.2% in FY2026
    ROMA, ITA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.