Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, TX

RAVEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC

RAVEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC received $242.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−76% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.7M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($242.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$242.5K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
12%
UEI
GGH1MB7QWGN5
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 310.6KFY2017
  2. 549.8KFY2018
  3. 351.7KFY2019
  4. 422.4KFY2020
  5. 479.6KFY2021
  6. 385.9KFY2022
  7. 184KFY2023
  8. 705.8KFY2024
  9. 1MFY2025
  10. 242.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$242.5K100%
    6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$157.3K65%
  2. Facilities & utilities$85.3K35%

Where the work was performed

  1. Sabine County, TX$157.3K65%
  2. Angelina County, TX$56.3K23%
  3. Winn Parish, LA$24.2K10.0%
  4. Rapides Parish, LA$4,8252.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition12%
    US 39% · $29K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions12%
    US 8.7% · $29K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR VEGETATION MANAGEMENT IN THE STRING TOWN PROJECT ON THE ANGELINA-SABINE RANGER DISTRICT, NATIONAL FORESTS AND GRASSLANDS IN TEXAS$157.3K
    Forest Service· Sabine County, TX· Professional services· Jun 2, 2026 – Jun 2, 2026· 12444026F0046
  2. PREPARATION OF AN APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA), BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION, AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)/DECISION NOTICE (DN), IF APPROPRIATE AFTER ANALYSIS, FOR THE GLOVER PROJECT IN HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAS, ON THE DAVY CROCKETT N$110.8K
    Forest Service· Walker County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2025 – May 27, 2026· 12363N25F4198
  3. CYCLONE HILL CE/BE$56.3K
    Forest Service· Angelina County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Aug 11, 2026 – Aug 11, 2026· 12363N26F4112
  4. INSTALL NEW, REPLACE, AND REFURBISH EXISTING RCW INSERTS FOR WINN RD, LA.$24.2K
    Forest Service· Winn Parish, LA· Facilities & utilities· Mar 23, 2026 – Mar 23, 2026· 12443926F0013
  5. INSTALL RED COCKADED WOODPECKER (RCW) ARTIFICIAL CAVITIES ON THE CATAHOULA RANGER DISTRICT$7,896
    Forest Service· Grant Parish, LA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 23, 2025 – Aug 19, 2026· 12444025F0098
  6. (5.3.5.1) RED-COCKADED WOODPECKER (RCW) INSERT INSTALLATION-CONTRACTOR PROVIDED INSERT ON VERNON UNIT OF THE CALCASIEU RANGER DISTRICT$4,825
    Forest Service· Rapides Parish, LA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 12443926F0161

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAGEBRUSH ADVISORS, LLC$1.4M+178% in FY2026
    GOLDEN, CO · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  2. BECKER SUPPORT SERVICES LLC$940.1K
    CLAREMONT, CA · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CRAWFORD BROS., INC.$931.8K−100% in FY2026
    KLAMATH RIVER, CA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.