Federal contractor · ALPINE, UT

REALCO DEVELOPMENT LLC

REALCO DEVELOPMENT LLC received $723K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−18% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $6.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($399.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$723K
New awards
5
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GNSNR5NA6MH4
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.5KFY2019
  2. 360.3KFY2020
  3. 1.9MFY2021
  4. 1MFY2022
  5. 578.4KFY2023
  6. 1.2MFY2024
  7. 883.1KFY2025
  8. 723KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$399.7K55%
  2. Equipment maintenance$323.2K45%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $723K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $723K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Tooele County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Apr 22, 2024 – Jun 2, 2026· W911S624C0002
  2. Department of the Navy· San Bernardino County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Feb 6, 2026 – Apr 16, 2026· M0068126F0091
  3. Department of the Army· Weber County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Mar 30, 2023 – Mar 13, 2026· W911SA23P3055
  4. Department of the Navy· San Bernardino County, CA· Equipment maintenance· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· M0068126F0202
  5. Department of the Navy· San Bernardino County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Apr 27, 2026 – Apr 27, 2026· M0068126F0155

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PASO ROBLES, CA · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection
  2. SANFORD, NC · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection
  3. COGETRINA LOGISTICS$1.5M−100% in FY2026
    TOURNAI, BEL · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.