Federal contractor · NEW YORK, NY

RECURSION CO

RECURSION CO received $3.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+41% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $9.2M. Its largest customer was Department of Housing and Urban Development ($3.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.9M
New awards
3
Sole-source
29%
Single offer
32%
UEI
C8UWL84MLRS4
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.3MFY2023
  2. 1.3MFY2024
  3. 2.8MFY2025
  4. 3.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of Housing and Urban Development$3.9M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$3.9M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. New York County, NY$3.9M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition61%
    US 39% · $2.4M
  • Sole-source awards29%
    US 30% · $1.1M
  • Single-offer competitions32%
    US 8.8% · $1.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. PROGRAM FINANCIAL ADVISOR$5M
    Department of Housing and Urban Development· New York County, NY· Professional services· Mar 1, 2023 – Jan 30, 2026· 86615723F00002
  2. GLOBAL ESG INVESTMENT POLICY AND INVESTOR INTELLIGENCE: MONITOR GLOBAL ESG POLICY AND REGULATION CHANGES, IDENTIFY THOSE THAT HAVE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON GINNIE MAE, ANALYZE SUCH IMPACTS.$2.6M
    Department of Housing and Urban Development· New York County, NY· Professional services· Nov 26, 2024 – Sep 22, 2026· 86615525C00001
  3. GLOBAL MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES COMPETITIVENESS ANALYTICS CONTRACTOR ANALYTICAL CAPABILITIES FOR ASSESSING PHYSICAL RISK IMPACTS TO ITS MBS PORTFOLIO SERVICES$1.5M
    Department of Housing and Urban Development· New York County, NY· Professional services· Jul 28, 2026 – Jul 28, 2026· 86615526F00011

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FEDERAL PRACTICE GROUP LLC$6.9M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveHousing and Urban Development · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. THE ACUNA CORPORATION$8.2M−66% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX STATION, VA · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveHousing and Urban Development · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. NATIVE AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LLC$8.4M−41% in FY2026
    PAWLEYS ISLAND, SC · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveHousing and Urban Development · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • RecursionAI match · 95%
Lobbying · 2025
$100K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2025
$400K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$100K
    2 reports
  2. 2024$200K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$100K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Science and technology8 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES8 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE8 reports
  3. Food & Drug Administration (FDA)6 reports
  4. Natl Institutes of Health (NIH)4 reports
  5. Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP)3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ATLAS CROSSING LLC$400K
    10 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.