Federal contractor · MC LEAN, VA

RED CELL PARTNERS, LLC

RED CELL PARTNERS, LLC received -$140K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2022: $21.5M. Its largest customer was Missile Defense Agency ($500).

Obligations · FY2026: -$140K
New awards: 2
Sole-source: —
Single offer: —

UEI: XHRWKAHGHKX7

Small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

6.5MFY2022
7.2MFY2023
8MFY2024
0FY2025
-140KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
1 awards
Department of the Air Force-$140.5K0.0%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Research & development$500100%

Where the work was performed

Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

DEFCON AI, SBIR PHASE III$20M
Department of the Air Force· St. Clair County, IL· Professional services· Sep 30, 2022 – Feb 11, 2026· FA445222C0022
SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF442

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

RBR-TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$7.9M−53% in FY2026
ODENTON, MD · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
LIB SRC INC$7.9M+797% in FY2026
MYERSVILLE, MD · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
WEBSEC, CORP$8M+762% in FY2026
MURRIETA, CA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

Red Cell Partners, LLCAI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2026: $120K; 2 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026: $220K

Lobbying by year

2025$100K
2 reports
2026$120K
2 reports

Top issues

Defense4 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES4 reports
U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

American Defense International, Inc.$220K
4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 8800 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20271 report
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2026
H.R. 9495 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20271 report
119th Congress · Introduced · 2026
S. 4784 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20271 report
119th Congress · Reported by committee · 2026

1 of 4 reports (2025–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.